How to treat the problems of "affordable housing" and "waiting for people"?

Shandong 1.29 million sets, Hainan more than 9,000 sets, Guangdong 1. 1.5 million sets, Yunnan 23,000 sets ... Recently, the audit results of several provinces exposed the embarrassment of vacant affordable housing. On the one hand, low-and middle-income groups look forward to realizing the "dream of living in peace" as soon as possible, while on the other hand, a large number of affordable housing are vacant and "cold". In some places, the occupancy rate of affordable housing is low, and "mass housing" has been repeatedly embarrassed. Originally, "one room is hard to find" affordable housing has appeared unexpected "waiting for people" phenomenon. Current affairs review:

From no house to a house is one property, and having a better house is another property. The difference between the two is that the former is a basic living condition, and the latter is a process of upgrading according to one's ability. Affordable housing is obviously to solve the problem from no housing to housing. It can't and shouldn't include the problem of housing upgrading, because if it does, it will obviously no longer be affordable housing. From the actual situation, most of the affordable housing, whether in lots or in property management, has shortcomings. However, after all, this is a guarantee bottom line, which solves the first problem from scratch. If people really don't have a house, it is conceivable that they won't care too much, because it is most important to solve the immediate problem, and people who suffer from no home can understand this better.

However, judging from the phenomenon of "waiting for others", it seems that the applicant is too picky, and of course this individual situation is not ruled out. However, as far as such a large-scale "empty city plan" is concerned, such an interpretation cannot be established anyway. Imagine that any family without a house, old and young, is willing to give up the existing basic guarantee in order to achieve "one step in place" in the future. It's like giving up the daily breakfast for a big dinner. Young people may choose this step in place, but which family without a house does not live together? Therefore, the root cause of the phenomenon of "waiting for others" is not that the applicant is too picky, it is just an illusion and a superficial phenomenon, and there must be deeper problems behind the phenomenon.

Some time ago, many media have exposed the incident that civil servants in a first-tier city collectively illegally purchased affordable housing. There are similar incidents in other cities, and there are more than one, and there are affordable houses that have bought a BMW. Undoubtedly, it can be seen from these events that affordable housing is still a hot cake. So many homeowners are keen on affordable housing and are not picky. Why are real houseless families so picky? And this problem should be the real core of "empty city plan" and "housing and other" phenomena.

In fact, it's not that families without housing are picky about affordable housing, but that affordable housing is ruthlessly picky about families without housing. The phenomenon of housing is itself a question of "who to wait for". These are actually policy restrictions for affordable housing. In some places, the occupancy conditions clearly stipulated by national policies have been completely erased, because some local government departments are still developing affordable housing as commercial housing, and doing a good job in commercial housing under the banner of affordable housing. Therefore, the conditions set are vague and full of variables, and the final power of interpretation is always in the hands of the government.

These vague and changeable conditions make families who really don't have a house completely confused, and they can only hit the big luck like lottery tickets, and the probability is the same as winning the lottery. If several applications fail, they think they are unqualified, but this is exactly what the government wants. Because they have a house in their hands, they are not afraid that the rich will not come. Therefore, affordable housing has become a "living pawn" in the hands of government departments to collect money.

Therefore, the frequent "empty city plan" problem of affordable housing is a problem that national policies are overhead by local governments, and behind this problem, there are some corruption problems of approvers and problems of real estate economic governments.