Shangqiu woman took the certificate when she returned the deposit, but the property said she didn't receive it. Whose problem do you think it is?

I don't think this matter has anything to do with women, but also belongs to property issues.

In real life, in some places, there is no correct property management method at all, or even no management at all. For ordinary owners, if the owner pays the deposit to the property, the property needs to return the deposit normally regardless of whether the property admits that it has obtained the certificate. For residential property, property personnel need to look at their work with a professional eye, which is also one of the performances of the person in charge of the work.

What is this thing?

This happened in Shangqiu, Henan. A woman opened a restaurant at the gate of the community. Before opening a restaurant, she had to pay a certain deposit for the electricity meter, so the woman paid a fee of 3,000 yuan. When it was necessary to close the hotel, when the woman got the certificate to refund the deposit, the residential property actually said that it had not received the deposit and refused to refund the woman's deposit. The woman was very angry about this, but the staff of the residential property were very satisfied with it.

This matter has something to do with the residential property.

Personally, regardless of whether the property in this community admits to receiving the deposit, if the woman can prove that she paid the deposit, the property in this community definitely needs to return the deposit normally. For the staff of the property, after receiving the deposit, the staff of the property need to keep the work evidence as soon as possible, and also need to keep the deposit fee of the woman normally. For this woman, she needs to collect as much evidence as possible about her deposit, which can further help women defend their rights.

Generally speaking, some residential properties do look at all kinds of work with a very irresponsible attitude. After this problem occurs, I think all owners need to protect their basic rights and interests at the first time, because this kind of thing itself is related to the inaction of the staff of the residential property, and the owners only belong to the victims, so the owners do not need to pay for the behavior of the staff of the residential property.