Job Recruitment Website - Property management - What are the disadvantages of the property company suing the owner for arrears?

What are the disadvantages of the property company suing the owner for arrears?

1. legal fees: the property management company needs to invest a certain amount of legal fees, including attorney fees and legal fees, to sue the owners for arrears. If the property company wins the case, these expenses may be borne by the owner, but if the property company loses the case, these expenses may be borne by the property company itself.

2. Time and energy: It takes a certain amount of time and energy to sue the owner for arrears, including collecting evidence, submitting a complaint and attending the trial. These time and energy may have a certain impact on the daily operation and management of property management companies.

3. Reputation damage: If the property company does not sue the owner for default, or the owner proves in court that he has not defaulted, the reputation of the property company may be damaged. This may affect the business development and customer relationship of property management companies.

4. Deterioration of residential relations: If the contradiction between the property management company and the owners escalates, it may lead to other social problems, such as public security problems and environmental problems. This may have a negative impact on the harmony and stability of the community.

5. Financial losses: If the property management company does not sue the owner for default, it may face financial losses. This includes the legal fees already invested and the expected income to recover the arrears.