What do you mean, impound the car?

The impounded vehicle is a vehicle that is prohibited by the court from handling registration, alteration, transfer, mortgage cancellation, cancellation and pledge cancellation due to economic debt disputes. In judicial practice, we may often hear the argument of mortgage car. Both mortgage car and creditor's rights transfer car are the products of economic disputes. As long as the debt dispute is not resolved, it may become a "seizure" state.

According to the order number of the Ministry of Public Security 124, the businesses prohibited by the court during the seizure are clearly defined, that is, the businesses such as registration, change, transfer, mortgage cancellation, cancellation and pledge cancellation are prohibited during the seizure; However, annual examination, temporary license plate and replacement of license plate are not prohibited. The annual inspection of sealed vehicles is normal.

The owner can log in to the motor vehicle inquiry system of any public security bureau in China and enter the license plate number. If the status bar shows that it is locked, the car may be seized or mortgaged, and it is impossible to go through the formalities of transfer. Specifically, if the reason is inquired, the owner needs to bring relevant procedures (ID card, motor vehicle registration certificate, driving license) to the place where the vehicle license is issued to inquire about the reason.

Litigation preservation has a time limit. The people's court shall not freeze the bank deposits and other funds of the person subjected to execution for more than six months, seal up or detain movable property for more than one year, and seal up immovable property and freeze other property rights for more than two years. Vehicles are special movable property, and the period of sealing up and detaining shall not exceed two years.

If the storage period expires and the extension formalities are not handled, the storage effect will disappear and it can be automatically unsealed.

Extended data

The court took enforcement action against "Lao Lai" and tried to tow the vehicle away from the community where "Lao Lai" was located and seal it up, but it was blocked by the property on the grounds of protecting the owner's rights and interests. On the afternoon of the 7th, the court of Suzhou Industrial Park issued a fine of 300,000 yuan to the property company.

20 13, Ji borrowed more than 3 million yuan from Guo on the grounds of doing coal business, and promised to pay it off within one year. But a year passed, Ji didn't send a penny, and he was still "missing" frequently. Guo angrily sued the court. After trial by the court, Ji was sentenced to return Guo's loan and interest totaling more than 3 million yuan. After the judgment came into effect, Ji refused to perform the judgment and Guo applied for execution.

The park court has auctioned the property under Ji's name and seized a car, and the execution proceeds from the auction will repay part of the debt. However, because Ji has been hiding in Tibet, the court has not seen him many times in the early morning, and the case has progressed slowly.

On the morning of February 7 10, the executive court of the park court received a phone call from Guo, the executor of the application, saying that Ji's car appeared in a certain district of the park. The executive police quickly went with relevant materials, work permits and law enforcement recorders. After arriving at the scene, Ji's car was sealed immediately, and relevant materials were delivered to Guo, and transcripts and videos were made on the spot.

In the end, the court ruled that the property company unreasonably obstructed the implementation and fined 300,000 yuan. At 3 o'clock in the afternoon, the court served a fine decision, and the person in charge of the property company refused to sign it, so the court police had to stay and serve it. At 4 o'clock in the afternoon, after repeated explanations and explanations by the judge, the property company finally released the trailer.

The judge reminded that citizens and legal persons have the obligation to cooperate when performing official duties in the court, and those who hinder judicial staff from performing their duties in any way may be fined and detained according to the seriousness of the case. The community is not a place outside the law, and the property management company is neither a party nor an obligor for assistance. The court does not need to issue legal documents to it alone, nor can it hinder the implementation for any reason.

People's Daily Online-The court seized the "Lao Lai" vehicle.