Does the landlord have the right to prohibit tenants from living with their mothers?

Hello, anonymous netizen! Regarding your question, cecimak would like to express the following views, but please note that these personal views are for your reference only and are not guaranteed to be absolutely correct!

I used to rent a two-bedroom apartment by myself, but recently I want to take care of my mother more closely because she is old. However, the landlord refused to let her move in on the grounds that the rented unit was a nuclear family. Does the owner really have this right?

A: The answer to the question depends on different situations and discussions!

Some owners have their own personal standards when choosing tenants, and some are unwilling to rent them to families with children; Some people don't want to rent it to celibate; Some people don't want to hire foreign domestic helpers. In short, there are various reasons!

Therefore, the landlord has the right to choose a tenant, but only if he refuses to rent the property before, or if it is stated in the lease that it is against the lease!

According to anonymous netizens, because the owner did not specify the restrictions on the elderly before renting the house, it was not listed in the lease! Of course, you can't interfere with the tenant's right to legally use the unit with your personal preference!

Simply put, anonymous netizens can ignore the owner's request and take over Ci's residence without their approval!

As long as you pay the rent on time, the owner will not renew the rent at most, but the right to order Ci to move in is unlimited!

If the owner wants to terminate the lease immediately, please ask him to compensate you according to the provisions of the lease, and you also have the right to refuse and demand the completion of the lease!

2014-01-25 20: 04: 04 Supplement:

Hello, Taiman netizen!

I really don't understand why our views are similar, but we can't have our own answers. Can't someone answer the next question?

Why can't I give a long answer? Are you playing WeChat now? Is there a word limit?

Maybe you don't like to explain your point of view, but can't you fill it with more words next time you answer the question?

The next netizen should answer at any time (Gary netizen has joined). Why is there a place exclusive to the next space?

2014-01-25 20: 05: 31supplement:

If Taiman netizens only refer to the questions you have answered, others should stop wasting their breath, because your concise statement is all the facts and the truth, and others should not reinvent the wheel!

I just want you to admit that you mean it, so I should respect you. From now on, when I meet your answer, I will stay away and never dare to die again! Give you the right to answer questions alone!

I dare ask Timon if that's what he means. Ask for instructions!

2014-01-26 21:14: 54 supplement:

Thank you very much for your supplementary comments! That is, as long as there is no prohibition clause in the lease, the owner has no additional power to restrict it!

Excuse me, is there any relevant clause in the lease signed by anonymous netizen and the owner?

2014-01-27 09: 38: 47 supplement:

I have different opinions about Gary's netizens downstairs!

First of all, if it has been clearly stated that the landlord has the right to choose the tenant, it is necessary to decide and stipulate the rules that the tenant should abide by before signing the lease. Basically, as long as it is illegal, the landlord has no right to interfere with how the tenant uses the property!

As for the second point, I believe the lease does not specify that only the tenant can live alone, and whether the tenant's relatives and friends will live for free or not will constitute separation!

I would like to ask Gary's netizens, after you rent a house, your girlfriend moved in together, some relatives and friends went back to Hong Kong to stay temporarily, and even raised a dog or a goldfish bowl. Is it equivalent to breaking the promise of living alone? The fact of subletting? Violation of the lease? What's more, the lease does not explicitly stipulate that only the tenant of the unit can live alone.

2014-01-27 09: 39: 43 supplement:

Gary, take public housing as an example, it's a bit beside the point, neither fish nor fowl! Public houses are housing benefits, and only family members listed in the lease can live in them! There is basically no such restriction in any other private house unless otherwise specified!

Moreover, in this case, the Housing Authority also has the plan and conditions of "limited temporary residence", allowing qualified non-registered personnel to temporarily live in public housing if necessary after reporting! According to the questioner's situation, even if he lives in public housing, I believe his application for taking care of his elderly mother will be accepted by the Housing Department!

As far as Gary's supplementary comments are concerned, I really can't understand how taking my elderly mother home to take care of her can be regarded as subletting. Gary's netizen, can you please explain why?

2014-01-27 09: 39: 58 supplement:

I always think that if the landlord is dissatisfied with the tenant's behavior, but the tenant's behavior does not violate the law and lease terms (unless the lease stipulates that only the elderly can live alone and do not accept the elderly), what the landlord can do is to take back the unit after the lease expires! Instead of arbitrarily and unreasonably restricting the tenant's legal right to enjoy the unit for some specious reasons!

2014-01-2812: 28: 29 supplement:

Respond to Taiman netizens!

Do you mean that because only one person signs the lease, it means that the employer only allows the contractor to live alone? You don't really understand the lease signing procedure and the validity of the lease! ?

According to your meaning, suppose a family of four rents a house (not public houses, but housing benefits). Does every family member have to sign a lease to have the right to live in the unit? Even a premature baby.

Have you ever rented a private house yourself? I had rented private houses many times before I moved into public housing. I have never seen a feat in which an owner or real estate agent asked the tenant's whole family to sign a lease! !

2014-01-2812: 29:11supplement:

One person can always be a representative by signing a contract, and the whole family can move in and out at any time. Sometimes the host doesn't even ask about the family situation and the number of people living in it! I've never seen a landlord say it's only for nuclear families! Some owners said that children were not welcome to live, but they also said in advance that they would not talk about it after signing the contract!

According to you and Gary's netizens, shouldn't there be a situation of renting a house and living with parents in the rental market in that society? There should be no sharing a house with brothers and sisters, right? Friends shouldn't share rooms? Shouldn't there be a situation of renting a house to a mistress for the night? There should be no case where the employer rents out the house to employees, right?

Because the above situation is not a nuclear family at all, and the contractor is not "living alone"!

2014-01-29 20: 53: 36 supplement:

Thank you for your fair advice!

2014-01-29 21:07: 24 supplement:

First of all, thank Yuen users for their flat opinions!

Taiman netizen, you digress again!

What does it have to do with the questioner asking the tenant to be driven away by the bank? If you don't say that the tenant was driven away for drug trafficking and prostitution!

Please answer the question whether the landlord has the right to prohibit the tenant from deciding how to use the property!

The contract only recognizes the contractor, so can you provide the only situation that requires all tenants to sign in except 99?

2014-01-29 21:09: 02 supplement:

Would you please answer the questions listed below?

Shouldn't there be a situation of renting a house and living with parents in the rental market in that society? There should be no sharing a house with brothers and sisters, right? Friends shouldn't share rooms? Shouldn't there be a situation of renting a house to a mistress for the night? There should be no case where the employer rents out the house to employees, right?

Because the above situation is not a nuclear family at all, and the contractor is not "living alone"!

If you think you are right, please explain why there are so many "ignorant owners" and "ignorant tenants" in society who violate the original rule that contractors can live alone.

Please answer the question directly! Don't hide, talk about him!

2014-01-29 21:10: 56 supplement:

There are also netizens in Taiman. You mentioned that even a newborn baby has to sign it in person to become one of the guests at home. Such an unreasonable statement actually comes from the mouth of Taiman netizens, so don't say more next time! Anyway, opposing for the sake of opposing is also one of the core values of China and Hong Kong! There is no longer the standard of "rationality"! Reference: cecimak's personal opinion and understanding! I hope I can help you! Is there a problem with the long (detailed) short answer?

Question: A has 10 yuan, and B has more than A 10 yuan. What are A and B ***?

Passerby A: A and B each 30 yuan.

Passerby B replied:10+10+10 = 30 yuan.

Passerby c answered: let b have x yuan, X= 10+ 10=20 yuan, and a and B*** have: 10+20=30 yuan.

Passerby Ding answered: Let them have X yuan, and X = 10+ 10 = 30 yuan.

......

Although the answer is the same, what is wrong with different translation methods? Yes, the landlord has the right to do so.

1. There are no regulations in Hong Kong that prohibit landlords from choosing tenants.

When you sign the lease, you show the landlord that only you live here. By bringing in additional tenants, you basically violated what you agreed at the beginning.

In fact, public housing is a typical example-unless you are authorized, no one can live in this housing unit except the registered people. Violation of this provision may lead to expulsion.

2014-01-27 04:11:57 supplement:

It's impossible for me to see what the little fish shooter said.

According to cecimak, I guess it has something to do with how the contract is drafted.

However, this is not the point.

This is actually related to how the tenant proposes to the landlord.

2014-01-27 04:13: 48 supplement:

For example, you ask a landlord that you want to rent a residential unit. However, you sublet it to others and make a profit.

Even the lease doesn't say that you can't do this. You actually have doubts about the facts that led to the contract, which is the reason for expressing the contract. This is a fact, and it is also very strange. D, I guess the owner is worried that your mother's death at work will affect the value of the property.

But in fact, you have the right to do so unless you violate the lease or the laws of China and Hongkong.

2014-01-2414:12: 25 supplement:

Cecimak netizen, I don't know what is the essential difference between your answer and mine, but if you want to answer, you have to write it down. If your next friend wants to answer, he will be in a better position than you.

2014-01-2810: 52: 52 supplement:

According to the standard, the lease is usually signed by only one person, which means that it is only used by the contractor. In fact, the host can really exercise the right to ban alcohol, but it is only common sense to ask his grandmother to live. You are really embarrassed, so Gary is not wrong.

2014-01-28 23:12: 04 supplement:

Ceci netizen, what you said is just common sense, not contractual point of view.

It is a fact that the contract only recognizes the contractor. If a family goes to live and the host doesn't understand, it is 100, accounting for 99 on the left, but it is not because 99 is not, which makes the exception 1 untenable.

Let me give you an example. If you rent a house, you can pay the rent on time every month, and you can get rid of it when you rent a house. The reason is that the bank has the right to rent, unless there is also a consent letter issued by the bank. In fact, most of the buildings are rented out, and the owners will never inform the bank. The bank has the right to take over the lease because it was built for self-occupation rather than lease.

Do you know the contract?

2014-01-28 23:13: 44 supplement:

You don't understand. Do you want all the bb freshmen? Answer: Yes.

Theoretically, it is necessary to inform the owner and get his consent.