Job Recruitment Website - Property management - Defense in property litigation
Defense in property litigation
Legal analysis: 1. The property management fee claimed by the respondent lacks basis. Second, the property management fee standard advocated by the respondent has no basis. 3. There is no basis for the late payment fee claimed by the respondent. IV. The respondent has actually paid the property management fee according to a higher standard.
Legal basis: Article 4 of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that the parties have the right to conclude a contract voluntarily according to law, and no unit or individual may illegally interfere. That is, the parties to a contract have the right to choose the object of conclusion and whether to conclude a contract. Neither party shall force the other party to accept the offer, nor shall it force the other party to perform its obligations without legal basis.
- Previous article:Judicial interpretation of property service contract disputes
- Next article:How to calculate the property fee for 44 months in arrears?
- Related articles
- Is Mudanjiang Mingxin Legal Consulting Co., Ltd. a formal network platform?
- Property service purchase orders within 300,000 yuan
- What about the surrounding facilities of Hefei Greenland International Huadu Community?
- Is Wen Yi Fan Huaxuan worth buying?
- How far is Shuozhou from Guo Liang Village?
- What is the surrounding environment of Changsha Garden Country Garden Blue Ocean? Is life convenient?
- How do real estate agents draw pictures when they run around?
- How about Gansu Jiasheng Property Management Co., Ltd.?
- China Evergrande, Evergrande Automobile and Evergrande Real Estate suspended trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
- Will Suzhou Xiangyang Bridge No.31No.32 be demolished?