Job Recruitment Website - Property management - How to calculate the property fee for 44 months in arrears?

How to calculate the property fee for 44 months in arrears?

1. Whether to collect the late fee for property fees depends on the stipulations of the property service contract. If there is a clause in the contract to charge a late fee, the property company can charge a late fee according to the proportion agreed in the contract. The specific levy amount is different according to the requirements of each property company, and it is necessary to refer to the signed property service contract. If there is an agreement in the contract, it shall be implemented according to the contract, which is generally three thousandths. If there is no agreement, it can be calculated according to the bank's interest for the same period.

2. Calculation formula of overdue fine for property fees: If it should be paid to 50 yuan this month, but the owner delays it by 14 months, 50 yuan × 5% = 2.5 yuan /2.5 yuan ×30 yuan per day (30 days per month) × 1050 yuan, it will be calculated according to the penalty of 5% per day, but there is one problem that must be clarified. That is to say, is the liquidated damages for the property company's inadequate service agreed in the property service contract equal to the liquidated damages for the owner's delayed payment of property fees? That is to say, if the property company's services are not in place, is it also agreed to compensate the owner for the liquidated damages at a daily rate of 5%? If the property service contract only stipulates the liquidated damages for the owner's late payment of property fees, but there is no stipulation on the liquidated damages for the property company's poor service (this situation is common in previous property service contracts), or the proportion of liquidated damages for the owner's late payment of property fees is obviously higher than that of the property company's poor service, resulting in unequal compensation amounts between the two parties, which violates the basic principles of contract law.