What happened in Zhan Hao during the Dragon Boat Festival?

Zhan Hao: Notes on the closure of WeChat in Zhan Hao.

Recently, Zhan Hao's WeChat articles were blocked for no reason, and last night's WeChat official account was also blocked for no reason, which also caused comrades not to see Zhan Hao's articles. Many comrades don't know how to answer many questions, so I will explain the situation to them:

Comrades all know that I have been blogging for more than 8 years since 2007. Zhan Hao has published 8 books, and published more than 5,000 original analytical articles with at least 20-30 million words through blogs, Weibo and WeChat, and has never spread any negative energy during this period. Over the past eight years, hundreds of thousands of like-minded comrades have walked together.

Up to now, Zhan Hao has more than 10 billion blog readers and more than 630,000 WeChat fans. The daily reading volume of WeChat is about 500,000, the number of visits is about 6.5438+0 million, and there are hundreds of thousands of blog readers. Weibo is also one of the popular and influential Weibo. Over the years, Zhan Hao has not caused any trouble to all parties, but has created economic benefits for enterprises and good social benefits for the country. In this regard, hundreds of thousands of comrades should have seen it.

Over the past eight years or so, under the circumstances that the general environment has become more difficult, Zhan Hao has adhered to its own principles, adhered to its own bottom line, and withstood various pressures. However, unexpectedly, today, when the overall environment is improving, the recent reality makes me feel a little chilly.

Tencent WeChat Management Department frequently posted to Zhan Hao WeChat in May, claiming that Zhan Hao WeChat violated relevant laws and regulations. As a party, I have made detailed research and study on the relevant national laws and regulations and Tencent's management regulations on WeChat. Whenever the state and Tencent issue relevant laws, regulations and systems, Zhan Hao will learn and digest them at the first time in order to abide by them. However, according to the relevant laws and regulations, the post sealed by the WeChat administrator really can't find out which one was violated. Zhan Hao has always adhered to "independent thinking, objective rationality, China's position and people's perspective". What kind of regulations does this insistence violate? Complaining through Tencent system, the result is the same every time: it is really illegal! But at the same time, enthusiastic comrades-in-arms ask the reasons through work communication channels. In the absence of clear reasons, posts were unsealed constantly, and at the same time, it was not specified which rule was violated, which really puzzled Zhang Er and Monk.

For more than eight years, Zhan Hao has always adhered to the bottom line thinking and adhered to the national legal and moral bottom line. The bottom line that has always been adhered to is above the seven principles that netizens follow established by the state in August 20 13, that is, the "seven bottom lines". Before this, we also communicated with the relevant administrative departments of the state, and their staff made it clear that as long as we abide by the "seven bottom lines", no one dares to seal the title. Now, it is very puzzling that what kind of regulations did Zhan Hao violate in these positive energy articles? Tencent has not given a clear answer to any party so far.

At first, an enthusiastic comrade-in-arms who read Zhan Hao 1978 in Tencent contacted the cook to help coordinate the relevant management departments in WeChat selflessly on the basis of maintaining Tencent's own commercial interests and friendship, hoping to find out the reason why the post was blocked, so as to avoid it as much as possible in the future. However, after many times of communication and coordination, the WeChat management department failed to give an accurate answer, and finally recovered the blocked posts.

The last two posts are even more incomprehensible. June 16, the original question "Why is the China stock market suddenly so bullish? It was blocked, and the enthusiastic comrades of Tencent asked why. The other party replied "misoperation" two hours later, and the article was unsealed a few hours later. June 19, published "Hong Kong's political reform package was rejected, who is the biggest loser? This article was blocked for no reason at 2 pm, and Tencent's enthusiastic comrades went to ask again. On the one hand, they said that they did violate the rules, on the other hand, they unsealed this article (this article later consulted the relevant management departments and contacted our staff to tell him clearly that this article was seen while he was on duty and there was no illegal content). But after work, they suddenly closed the account for no reason, and the account could not be logged in. On the landing page, it says, "Your account has been reported by a large number of users, which is suspected of violating relevant laws, regulations and policies, and all functions have been blocked ..." The article that has just been unsealed can be read, but it is said that a large number of users reported their accounts, which was suspected of violating relevant laws, regulations and policies, and was directly sealed. What is the reason? Open the "Related Laws and Regulations Link", which reads:

The Interim Provisions on the Development and Management of Public Information Services of Instant Messaging Tools and the Provisions on the Management of Internet User Account Names cover illegal information such as gambling and violence. If you have any questions about the above laws and policies, you can consult the local competent department of Internet information content.

In fact, since posting continuously recently, we have been keeping in touch with relevant state departments and asking for their opinions, so as to share Zhan Hao's articles with our comrades without violating the law. The staff agreed that Zhan Hao's article was positive and did not violate the relevant laws and regulations, and said that Tencent would not block the title for no reason. However, it's really strange that Tencent has blocked my account because I violated laws and regulations! For officials and businessmen, Zhan Hao is a weak man. Who should know about this situation?

Enthusiastic comrades specially called Tencent customer service to ask why Zhan Hao's WeChat account was blocked, and who blocked such a positive energy account? According to his comrades-in-arms, the reply he got from Tencent was that this was not Tencent's reason. Tencent's enthusiasm and comrades-in-arms asked their WeChat management department why, and the answer was related to current politics. Let's appeal to the relevant state administrative departments. We went to the national management department to complain, and the national management department didn't know about it at all, and coordinated with Tencent, but Tencent has not given a reply so far, which is really unexpected and shocking!

As an ordinary citizen, Zhan Hao has written so many positive energy analysis articles for more than eight years, and has never caused any trouble to the country, government or any enterprise. As long as it is reasonable and legal, we will try our best to cooperate. Because there are so many comrades waiting to read articles every day, Zhan Hao did not hesitate to put off a lot of business cooperation that might take up writing time, and stayed up until midnight every day to write. However, reality has taught us a painful lesson. In the face of such forces, Zhan Hao's efforts for more than eight years are completely helpless, and personal rights and interests are completely difficult to protect. In this regard, I am puzzled and feel a little chill about reality.

These chills, even when the environment was bad in the past, never happened. Unexpectedly, under the general environment of promoting the rule of law and strengthening network security management in China, such problems have appeared, which individuals have never thought and expected before. Therefore, as ordinary people, they may have to rethink their orientation in the future.

The net age of Zhan Hao is 18. He has been a Tencent user since Tencent's QQ has five digits. He witnessed Tencent grow from a small technical team to a business empire. Personally, he has always held a very positive attitude towards the brilliance created by Mr. Ma and his team. Over the years, no matter what criticism others have on Tencent, I always think that Tencent, as one of the leaders in the field of Internet application in China, has promoted the progress of Internet application in China and is an iconic company in the present era. Nowadays, the concept of "Internet" put forward by Mr. Ma is becoming an important part of China's market revolution, which has always been recognized by individuals.

Personally, Mr. Zhang Xiaolong, who founded WeChat, the most awesome APP empire in China, has always held a very positive attitude, because the appearance of WeChat has changed the ecology of Internet applications in China, greatly promoted the reform and upgrading of traditional industries, and is conducive to the long-term development of China, with a strong sense of progress.

Unexpectedly, Tencent and WeChat teams under the management of two outstanding business elites were so cruel and rude to users who had contributed to Tencent, regardless of customer experience. This cruelty and rudeness even completely ignored the repeated reminders of internal employees who have been safeguarding Tencent's commercial interests. As an official WeChat account user who ranked 10 to 30 in the official WeChat account Top 500 in the past year, in the past year or so, there were at least four or five hundred original articles on WeChat, and the official personal WeChat account brought more than 20 million visits to Tencent every month, and hundreds of thousands of long-term sticky active users. In the past year or so, individuals have never given Tencent any trouble, and they have always abided by Tencent's relevant regulations and have not crossed the line. Because Tencent is a very big company, we have always understood some things, and explained the real situation of Tencent to other WeChat users through channels when they complained (Tencent comrades revealed some difficulties of Tencent as a company of 70,000 people to the chef).

Zhang Xiaolong, the founder of WeChat, has always recognized the value of WeChat user experience. Recently, he has intensified his originality to enhance the WeChat experience of hundreds of thousands of comrades in the same industry for many years. However, it is such a user that Tencent can start the title simply and rudely for no reason. Then, I can't help asking, are the following people so simple and rude for the benefit of the company or for other purposes? Mr. Ma and Mr. Zhang Xiaolong, who have been trying to maintain the business reputation, business interests and brand value of Tencent and WeChat, are they aware of such behavior? Personally, I hope that if the two business elites can see Zhan Hao's explanation, please give a clear and definite answer to Tencent, a 18 quality old user. As an old user, this is the first time I feel chilling about Tencent!

Of course, I would also like to thank Tencent's enthusiastic comrades here. He did his best to maintain Tencent's business reputation, business interests and friendship. He is not only worthy of his professional ethics, but also worthy of 1978 friendship. This may be the only warmth related to Tencent in the cold!

In the past two years, many comrades suggested that Zhan Hao set up his own APP. With hundreds of thousands of staunch comrades, Zhan Hao has developed and gained a firm foothold in the field of APP. However, in view of time and energy, Zhan Hao didn't make any further plans on this matter, because he wanted to spend more time creating more analytical articles to share with his comrades-in-arms, so what is the need to concentrate on creating an APP to influence his own creation?

However, this incident has deeply hurt Zhan Hao and made me understand that I may have trusted the WeChat platform too much in the past, which may be a big mistake! Because, according to the current situation, the administrator who holds the power of life and death may "chop Zhan Hao's WeChat account under the horse" at any time according to his own mood, so that the hard-earned account can be preserved. Such an expectation that completely disobeys the rules is undoubtedly an unpredictable black hole. As an ordinary citizen and an ordinary user of Tencent, how can this be broken? Besides, Mr. Ma Hua Teng and Mr. Zhang Xiaolong, as the top of the pyramid of Tencent Empire, how can they have the time and energy to ask about the life and death of an ordinary user?

Based on this grim reality, individuals may really have to accept the advice of their comrades-in-arms and make other plans. Comrades, if they have any good ideas, opinions and suggestions, they can submit them to Zhan Hao by email or private letter. Individuals will learn from comrades' opinions with an open mind and study hard in the future.

Finally, thank you again for your concern and concern, especially thank you!

Zhan Hao, June 20th, 20 15.