1. If the property lends the vacant house of 10 to others without authorization, should the property compensate the owner?

Ms. Zhang in Chongqing has a vacant house that has been vacant for more than ten years. I didn't expect to go back today and find it full of people. The statement given by the property is that Ms. Zhang's house has been unoccupied for a long time. She thinks it is an unowned house and gives it to others.

In this news, Ms. Zhang, as the owner of the house, has absolute possession and right to use the house. Hopewell Property, as a tripartite service organization, only has the custody right to the client's house, but the property rents the house to others without authorization. This behavior is also wrong in the moral sense. From a legal point of view, the property should bear all consequences and losses for its own mistakes. Moreover, this neighbor is the property owner, and whether they know it or not, they all have some joint and several responsibilities. If you live without knowing it, the responsibility is lighter, and the property is the main responsible person, but its joint liability is inevitable. If the disposal plan and compensation level proposed by the property cannot satisfy Ms. Zhang, Ms. Zhang applies to the court for litigation. Let the property stop infringing and let the neighbors move out immediately, and the joint compensation and requirements should be a series. But because the rent can't be calculated, we can negotiate slowly and compensate for the damage to the house as soon as possible.

Originally, this should not have happened. An empty house is used by oneself without authorization, whether it is illegal or not. From a moral point of view, this is completely wrong. As we all know, asking for is stealing. Moreover, there are so many idle resources and things in society that you can use them privately. Or to possess, then the world will not be chaotic. If morality cannot restrain these improper behaviors, then we can only rely on legal weapons to defend our legitimate rights and interests in the end. Finally, regardless of the outcome of the legal judgment, there is no doubt about the compensation of the property to the owner. I hope there is a satisfactory solution to this matter.