Should the property be responsible for the theft of the owner's things in the community? Damaged public facilities and unreasonable property charges?

There must be circumvention clauses in the property owners' treaty, and the property is not responsible for the theft of the owners' goods in the community. Even those who pay management fees, such as cars in parking spaces being scratched, or bicycles being stolen, etc. Property is mainly the management of the community, not the subject of public security responsibility. There is no such thing as rationality and irrationality. For example, if your things are stolen and reported to the police, the public security is supported by our taxpayers. Is he obligated to solve the case? If we don't solve the case, will we not pay taxes to support him? Of course, a well-done property will have stronger security capabilities. It's not perfect. All we have to do is try to choose a good property. But if you can prove that the property dereliction of duty caused your theft, you can claim a little from the property, but how to obtain evidence?