Sudden cession of property

Whether there is a basis for demolition depends mainly on whether there are infringements and illegal acts.

First of all, it depends on whether your clothes hanger infringes on the lighting and ventilation of other homes, that is, the right of neighbors.

Neighboring right has relevant provisions in civil law and property law. To put it bluntly, property owners/tenants cannot infringe on the rights of neighboring owners such as lighting, ventilation and transportation.

/view/325795.htm

/view/88 1364.htm

Obviously, if your clothes hanger sticks out to dry clothes, it will have a certain impact on shading, dripping and ventilation downstairs. The affected people have the right to ask you to dismantle it.

Second, it depends on whether the clothes rack installed in your home violates national laws and regulations.

According to the Urban and Rural Planning Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the government can order the demolition of the property and impose a fine on "unauthorized temporary construction".

Judging from the above two points, your clothes rack is both infringing and illegal, and there is a basis for asking for its removal.

Third, the power of the Property Management Office.

1. The Property Management Office is a civil subject without public power and has the obligation to cooperate, but it cannot be used as a government or a court. Therefore, before going through legal or administrative procedures, the property management office cannot start demolition.

2. According to the current organization law of the owners' committee in China, the owners' convention does not become a legally binding document. Even with the authorization of the owners' meeting and the owners' committee, the property management office does not have enough legal principles to dismantle it.

3, but the injured owners and management offices can report the situation to the relevant government departments, and request administrative acceptance and deadline.

Fourth, LZ can take measures.

1. Because the rule of law varies from place to place, if LZ has enough background, it can be ignored.

2. If the relationship with the downstairs is not too bad, you can try to do the work downstairs. Civil matters, no one prosecuted, and the law did not care. Management is more willing to ignore.

3. If the owner downstairs confirms it, it is suggested that LZ take the initiative to dismantle it.