The child was hospitalized for stealing takeaway, and the parents sued the man for compensation: stealing your takeaway, you killed yourself, what do you think?

In life, it will happen that your things are stolen. Some people order takeout, and it's the same. The takeaway ordered by a man was stolen. Once or twice, you admitted it. But after three transgressions of five times, men get a little angry. He ordered a takeaway, which was super spicy. As a result, the neighbor's child was recruited, and his parents asked the man to pay 2000 yuan. This request is a bit wonderful.

First of all, it is necessary to determine whether a man's behavior is intentional or preventive.

Is it normal for men to have their things stolen? Definitely not normal! Some people say that in real society, this kind of thing should be reduced to a minor event. As the old saying goes, a loss is a blessing. This man's blessing is really full.

However, men don't think so. He ordered takeout for himself. Maybe eat after work, or order a midnight snack. However, when it comes to eating, it's gone. Isn't this anger great? Excuse me, at this time, will there be the idea of punishment?

In Luo Xiang's words, when someone hits you on the head with a beer bottle, do you fight back with a kitchen knife? Of course, it's called self-defense! Is it intentional or preventive for men to choose super spicy ways? This is obviously intentional.

Even if it is intentional, can it be considered intentional? Not necessarily! Because men can eat by themselves, this practice is to prevent their takeout from being stolen. Some people say this is a bit of a drag. The principle of law is that whoever advocates gives evidence.

If the child's parents prove that the man's behavior is intentional, they can file a lawsuit against him and ask him to compensate them for their losses, whether it is 2000 yuan or 1 10,000 yuan. However, if there is no proof, then there is no problem with the man's behavior.

Second, the practice of men is worth promoting.

That man was angry because the takeaway he ordered was stolen. This is a high probability event! Because when there is a huge contrast between people's expectations and reality, anger comes from this. The man thought of a good preventive method, that is, put spicy food, and it is super spicy.

The purpose of this is to let the person who stole his takeaway know that this behavior is shameful. This is not only shameful, but also illegal. Although the illegal cost is not high, according to the relevant provisions of the Public Security Punishment Law, this kind of behavior should be admonished.

Although it's not a big deal, don't make it a small one. Parents may think this thing is not big, but men think this thing is too bad. Because I ordered takeout, I didn't get it when I wanted to eat it, and it wasn't once or twice.

Faced with this situation, men take a super spicy way to let people who steal takeout know that stealing from others will bear the consequences. Because the man didn't know who stole it, he didn't target a specific group of people, and he didn't go beyond the necessary scope.

Beyond the necessary scope, poisoning in takeaway, etc. This kind of thing will kill people. I believe men also know. Therefore, instead of taking this radical approach, he taught the vegetable thief a lesson. In this case, it is allowed.

Men's behavior is to punish those who steal food, not to hurt each other. As for the child, it's his problem and his guardian's problem to continue eating because he feels spicy after taking a bite of takeaway. There is a problem after eating, that is, the guardian's supervision is not in place, and it has nothing to do with men.

Third, parents of children should reflect.

Parents don't know that children steal from other people's homes? Isn't it a bit too much to indulge children after knowing? Take advantage, not in this way. People keep quiet because they think quarreling is shameful, but parents think this kind of thing can be done, which is a matter of ideology.

The child is too young to know anything. But parents are so ignorant, are they educating their children or setting a bad example for them? If children develop such bad habits since childhood, they will steal takeout at this time, and when they grow up, they won't know what they will steal. If you wanted to educate at that time, it is estimated that you could not educate.

If parents can't educate, they should be educated by society or even by law. At that time, will parents still be complacent? Think this is an advantage? Educating a child is to standardize his words and deeds, not to indulge!

Children's education needs parents to practice. If parents can't do well, don't expect their children to be good. I'm a hero. I'm talking about my parents' words and deeds. If the child's parents don't realize the problem, they are hurting the child.

This parent, let's reflect on his behavior. How dare you sue others in court? How dare you ask for 2000 yuan? Then use this 2000 yuan to buy a lesson and educate children not to take other people's things at will, which is worth it.

If you feel cheated, educate your children well and make them indomitable men. It is also a kind of luck for children to be hospitalized. It can make him stop doing bad things in time, and it is also a blessing in disguise! What do you think of this matter?