The property does not provide services, but the property fee is charged.

Legal analysis: the owner is dissatisfied with the quality of the work of the property management company and naturally unwilling to pay the property fee. In the view of the property management company, it is the obligation of the managed object to pay the property fee. In this case, the contradiction between the property management company and the owner is constant. Property management companies often demand to pay property fees under the threat of water and power cuts, and owners also shout to cancel the property. Neither of these can be said to be reasonable, but we should realize that the owner is not only the object of service, but also the object of management, and also has the status of supervisor and has the right to supervise the property company.

Legal basis: Article 944 of General Principles of Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the owner shall pay the property fee to the property service provider as agreed. If the property service provider has provided services in accordance with the agreement and relevant regulations, the owner shall not refuse to pay the property fee on the grounds that he has not accepted or does not need to accept the relevant property services. If the owner fails to pay the property fee within the time limit in violation of the agreement, the property service provider may urge him to pay it within a reasonable time limit. If the payment is not made after the expiration of a reasonable period, the property service provider may bring a lawsuit or apply for arbitration. The property service provider shall not stop power supply, water supply, heat supply and gas supply to demand payment of property fees.