Job Recruitment Website - Property management company - Why did the woman's uninhabited villa become the shooting place of the crew?

Why did the woman's uninhabited villa become the shooting place of the crew?

It seems absurd that something like this happened two days ago. The incident was that a woman bought a luxury villa in her hometown five years ago, but never went back to live. Two days ago, when she was watching an online TV series, she suddenly found it and exclaimed in surprise that the woman was not sleeping in my bed. So he went home to check, and the result surprised her. His home became a place where the crew filmed TV dramas without her consent, and it was not only this crew who filmed TV dramas in her villa.

In the past five years, many crews have been filming in this villa, so the woman was angry and took the villa property and TV drama production company to court. I feel that these things are too absurd to happen in real life. After the defendant went to court, it also exposed the reason why the crew used the villa without the permission of the villa owner. Once, the outreach producer contacted the property in an ordinary capacity and wanted to find a scene that could be filmed in line with the plot. As a result, the property took him to see the model house.

Then the producer took some photos of the model house and brought them back to the director. The director said it was good, so he decided to go to this place to shoot some scenes in the TV series. Later, after the crew communicated with the sales staff of the real estate, they filmed the villa for seven days. The villa was owned by the owner, and the crew was not informed of the property at that time, so the crew did not know the situation. He believes that developers have the right to dispose of the right to use the house, so he took a photo. I think most of the reasons for this incident are property.

This house is actually owned by the owner, so you can't use the ownership of this house casually, and you can't let others in and out of other people's houses casually, which is equivalent to infringing on other people's rights. And the state also has relevant regulations. The ownership of a citizen's house belongs to him personally, and no unit or individual may infringe upon it. This is our right to privacy. Therefore, the property and the crew can't enter other people's houses to shoot without the explicit consent of the obligee.