Why should the new regulations of Shandong property fees be pushed to the whole country?

On June 4th, it was reported by the media that the General Office of Shandong Provincial Government issued Order No.317 of Shandong Provincial Government on June 2nd, and decided to implement the Measures for the Administration of Property Service Charges in Shandong Province from July 20th18+0, so as to standardize the standards of property charges. The Measures for the Administration of Property Service Charges in Shandong Province gives a reasonable and legal definition to the property charges that frequently cause disputes and even conflicts at present, as well as the problems that the boundaries are clear and definite according to law, but in practice, the subject of rights and obligations is absent and the boundaries are vague. Therefore, this method is a provision made by the local government on the legal enforcement of real estate and other real rights at the administrative law enforcement level according to the statutory authority.

The Measures for the Administration of Property Service Charges in Shandong Province defines the most controversial ownership issue for the first time. The "Measures" stipulate that the income from the use of parts of the property, the income from the use of facilities and equipment, and the income from the use of parking spaces and venues shall be owned by all owners, and the owners' meeting shall decide their use methods and purposes. In this regard, the "Measures" clearly stated that property service charges include property service charges, motor vehicle parking fees and other service charges; Storage rooms and garages of ordinary houses are not included in the charging area of property service fees. Ordinary residential vacant for more than six months after delivery, early property service fee reduction; According to the nature and characteristics of different properties, government-guided prices and market-regulated prices are implemented respectively; Property services companies that set charging standards that exceed the floating range of government-guided prices, force or disguise compulsory services and charge fees, will be punished in accordance with regulations; If a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law.

The above-mentioned "Measures" are actually formulated according to the current real estate and other relevant laws and regulations and their spirit. In other words, the current practices that are contrary to the above Measures or even mainstream practices, such as motor vehicle parking fees, elevator advertising fees and other service charges are arbitrarily controlled by property managers, and the storage rooms and garages of ordinary houses are included in the charging scope of property service fees. These are against the law and should be corrected.

However, why the abnormal, irregular and even illegal practices in the management of property service charges have always existed, and why this practice has become the mainstream of property charging methods in quite a few places, I am afraid this is not only a problem of "people do not lift it, officials do not correct it", but also a problem of ignoring the rights of property residents. In fact, in many first-and second-tier cities, the real estate market is often a seller's market. Real estate developers with deep pockets are strong and uncompromising. Ordinary residents spend money to buy a house, as if they were blessed. It is lucky to be able to buy a house. Only by obeying the property, how dare they argue about "small money"? In the past, many cases arising from disputes between owners and property have not been properly handled and solved in law, which is also the reason why owners and residents dare to be angry and dare not speak out about the property charging method that obviously violates the law.

Source: Guangming Net