Now many people want to live in a villa, which is very comfortable. Should villas become new economic growth points?

The cost of villas is high. On the same land, there are far fewer people living in villas than buildings. It means that the same land area should reach the same consumption power, which means that the consumption of the people in the villa area must be improved and the cost of living will increase a lot. It's good to have money to live in a villa, but having no money to live in a villa means a decline in your quality of life.

Although the villa is good, not everyone can afford it. As an economic growth point, it does not have universal effect, so villas will be a minority consumption for a long time to come, and will not become a mass consumption.

The economic growth point is still mainly concentrated in the new Internet of Things economy under the Internet economy, such as express delivery, take-out and logistics. Food consumption will increase substantially in the future. Investment in manufacturing industry will increase.

With the existence of regulation, housing will be relatively stable, because under the long-term mechanism of the property market, there will be daily limit measures for housing prices, and the probability of skyrocketing will be greatly reduced. Of course, those areas without supervision may get out of control. In the future, there may be some small cities whose housing prices will skyrocket and plummet, but the overall situation is stable.

Villa is originally a niche consumer product, and it will not change much. Villa seldom invests because of its high maintenance cost, high holding cost and poor liquidity and investment. The main investment is still concentrated in the core areas of first-and second-tier cities, and the real estate investment cycle has become longer. Residential real estate has been strengthened. People who live in villas can't afford a house, and those who can afford a house may not be able to afford a villa.

China's existing villa products are overproduced. The relationship between supply and demand is misplaced. Some villa products look magnificent, but the surrounding facilities are poor. To tell the truth, some villas are not as good as farmers' own houses. Rich people, not bad money, can afford villas, but the property cost is similar to that of buildings, and the property level can be imagined. Real rich people don't need many residential products. At present, the mainstream domestic high-end residential products are mainly concentrated in first-tier cities and surrounding well-equipped core areas. In the future villa direction, the doorman should have at least a bachelor's degree, the security guard should be armed police level, there should be yacht space, the community should have a court, its own aristocratic school, specialized private doctors and customized community services. Without these high-end services, rich people will be uncomfortable to live in, and big houses alone will not attract consumers. The house is not big, but the quality of life.

20% of the rich people in China are quite rich, but the excellent villa products in the market are quite scarce (not the villa that is even inferior to the farmer's house as mentioned above, and the second is a veritable high-end consumer-grade villa). With the increasing income of the rich, the price of villas will definitely rise. But this market will not be very big, because the rich are a minority after all.