How to report arbitrary charges in the village?

The problem of charges around villages in Dongguan suddenly became the focus of attention. In fact, not only Dongguan, but the whole Pearl River Delta region is doing this kind of thing.

Most of the village wai fees were developed during the two-year Y-defense period because the village management had to be closed-relying on "machines" to lay eggs. I don't know which expert came up with this trick so heartlessly, so there is no room for doubt.

On the surface, it seems that charging the surrounding villages is for the order of the village, but in essence it is to collect money. The so-called property is also made by grassroots q force itself. They don't charge villagers or owners less money, but only stare at a large number of outsiders, which is equivalent to charging foreign tenants for vehicles. Judging from the different treatment, their behavior of charging around the village should be incomplete. If the procedures are complete and completely legal, they will be treated equally. How could anyone be spared?

Even some villages charge tenants property fees. I have read the posted notice, and I am going to charge the tenant a property fee of about one yuan according to the rental area, but the landlord will not accept the owner's own house. But then somehow it didn't happen.

A typical juicer for robbing the poor and helping the rich, a typical juicer for the disadvantaged groups-consciousness.

At that moment, I felt very uncomfortable and disgusting. Our society has been pursuing fairness and justice and trying to balance the rich and the poor. But this charging method completely subverts your concept. It turns out that the world runs counter to your ideal.

The most unbearable thing is the village charge in Zhenmei Village, Guangming Xin Qiang Street. The village is very large, and there are only seven or eight toll stations. All roads crossing the village are included in the toll range.

Recently, "charging around the village" has become a hot topic. By June of 20021year, the number of motor vehicles in Dongguan had exceeded 3.5 million. According to official statistics, the total supply gap of parking spaces in Dongguan exceeds 2 million, and there is a big contradiction between parking supply and demand. In order to solve this problem, 32 towns and streets in Dongguan *** 138 village (community) have implemented parking charges around the village.

At the same time, the "village-surrounding charges" in Dongguan are controversial, especially on July 20th, Guangdong Provincial Communications Department opened Guangdong "Minsheng Hotline", named "village-surrounding charges" in Dongguan, and the program group made an unannounced visit to expose the "village-surrounding charges" in Shebei Village of Huangjiang Town. In the program, the staff of Dongguan Transportation Bureau was asked at the scene and became the "laughing stock" of the outside world. What do the masses think of Dongguan's "village charge"? Du Nan started this topic with the topic of "Dongguan's' Village Charge'". Do you agree? "Hot little online survey. According to the data, the proportion of online respondents who oppose "village-surrounding charges" is as high as 9 1.2%, and 86.7% of online respondents strongly call for the cancellation of "village-surrounding charges".

9 1.2% of the online respondents are against "village-surrounding charges"

"Do you agree with Dongguan's' every village is connected'?" The hot topic of queuing has been widely discussed by the public since it was launched on the afternoon of July 28th, 20021. Up to the afternoon of July 30th, 20021year 16, a total of 2793 valid questionnaires were collected in three days. According to the survey data, local villagers in Dongguan account for 1 1.6%, Wan Xin people account for 65.3%, and others account for 23. 1%. Among them, 66.9% of online respondents have encountered "village-surrounding charges" above 10 in Dongguan.

At the same time, the survey results show that among the citizens interviewed online, only 8.8%, or 245 votes, are in favor of the implementation of "village-surrounding charges", and the proportion of opposing the implementation of "village-surrounding charges" is as high as 9 1.2%, or 2548 votes.

For the citizens who are in favor of "charging around the village", the view is that "charging around the village" is conducive to good traffic order and public security management in the village? Among them, some citizens said that as long as there are some wealthy communities and villages in Dongguan, all the repairs, maintenance, lighting, greening and so on. It's all paid by the village, whether it's a township road or a village road. In this case, the village said that all the money was paid by the village, so it is understandable to really stop and collect management fees.

For the online respondents who have objections, their opinions are mostly focused on charging without management, so as to manage the charges and not provide good services; In addition, the idea of "treating locals and foreigners differently" has rebounded sharply, and many people have been questioned that this management method is unreasonable. Therefore, in the questionnaire survey, 86.7% of online respondents called for the abolition of "village-surrounding charges".

The mandatory "village-surrounding charges" are the most questioned.

In the investigation and voting on the chaos of "charging around the village" in Dongguan, the voting rate of five of the nine options exceeded 50%. Compulsory "charging around the village" is the most questioned. 68.6% of the people think that the relevant departments set up cards around the village and set up parking and charging facilities without consulting the residents in the jurisdiction before starting to collect fees. Du Nan noticed that on the platform of sunshine politics, from the beginning of this year to July 30th, the "village charge around the village" in Baicaoling, Wentang, Dongcheng, Dongguan was complained twice. The reason for questioning was that Wentang Village Committee had set up parking charge facilities around the village without consulting the residents in the area, ignoring the voices of the masses.

In addition, online respondents believe that the current chaos of "village-surrounding charges" in Dongguan mainly exists in the following aspects: the destination of village-surrounding charges is unknown, and village-surrounding charges occupy public resources, regardless of charges, and are treated differently in the charging standards of locals and foreigners.

Among them, 59.2% people said that they did not receive the relevant invoices after payment and did not know where the payment was going. Who collected the money and whether it was used for municipal engineering construction left doubts in the hearts of the people. At the same time, when asked about the staff of the toll booth during his visit to Du Nan, the staff said, "I don't know, I just came here to work." No one knows who the money was taken from the people and used on.

58% of the respondents set up checkpoints for roads and highways outside the village; The voting rate of charging indifference reached 56. 1%. According to the questionnaire data, 55.7% people are dissatisfied with the differential treatment of local and foreign charging standards. Du Nan visited the toll booth in Duozhen Street, and found that the staff at the toll booth said that parking for local residents was free, and parking fees were required for vehicles from other places. During the interview, some citizens said that it is precisely because many new Dongguan people have regarded themselves as Dongguan people that they have been treated differently in terms of "charging around the village". Such charging methods and management methods are unreasonable.