What do you think of 1960 Xiangtan owners being beaten by security guards and their family property being divided?

I think it should be up to the police to decide whether the property is responsible, because the evidence at this stage can't prove that the security guards started hitting people. The 60-year-old owner is suspected of being beaten by security guards, and the property has its own statement! The incident took place in Changsha City, Hunan Province. Mr. Zhou's father came to the security booth to ask for a statement because the underground parking space in the community refused his vehicle to enter, and there was a conflict during the dispute between the two sides. Mr. Zhou said that his father was rushed to the hospital by two security guards. His father suffered a chest fracture and multiple soft tissue contusions. The medical expenses have reached more than 6000 yuan. But when Mr. Zhou asked the property for a statement, the property denied Mr. Zhou's statement. Mr. Qiu, the person in charge of the property, said that the relevant notice has been presented for the underground parking fee. Mr. Zhou's father may have drunk wine that day and insulted the security guard at the security booth. There was a dispute between the two sides, but the security guard didn't do it, just dissuaded and intercepted it. These are all proved by monitoring records.

Mr. Zhou said it was difficult to accept this statement, and both sides held their own words.

I think the incident should still be decided by the police, and whoever should bear the responsibility will bear the responsibility. In this incident, Mr. Zhou thought that his father was hospitalized because the security guard beat him, but the property denied this statement and claimed that there was a video to prove that the security guard did not do it. Judging from the information released by both parties at this stage, it is difficult for us to judge whether this matter is right or wrong, nor can we insist that Uncle Zhou was really beaten by security guards and was hospitalized.

Under such circumstances, I think the incident should be left to the police to determine the division of responsibilities, and whoever should bear the responsibility will bear the responsibility. If the police determine that the property is responsible, the property will bear the corresponding losses. In addition, it is not worth advocating that Mr. Zhou's father still defends his rights in an unreasonable way after collecting parking fees from the property. His behavior of insulting security guards and grabbing keys is really easy to cause quarrels. But if the security guards beat them, the property owner must bear the corresponding responsibility.

The property said that the incident had been handled by the police, and I think this is the best way to handle it. Personally, I can understand Mr. Zhou's thoughts, but the responsibility for the incident should still be judged by the public security organs.

In fact, in real life, the contradiction between the owner and the property is common in residents' lives, but residents' rights protection should also be reasonable and legal, otherwise they are likely to bear corresponding responsibilities, and if their legitimate rights and interests are violated, residents should also take up legal weapons to protect themselves.