What did the host send? What was the result?

The owner sent a banner to the property, and the verdict was that the owner compensated and apologized to the property.

There is a community in Anhui province, and many owners jointly send banners to the property. What does it say? What can't be done, take the first place with money? . After that, the property took the main complaint to court. According to the court's judgment, it was necessary to compensate the property for 3,000 yuan and apologize. This judgment is unreasonable. I think an apology is enough and no compensation is needed. After all, the property has a bad reputation in the local area and does not need compensation. As for apologizing, it is mainly an incorrect way to protect rights.

1, the judgment demands compensation and apologizes. Ms. Wang is the owner of a community. With her house damaged and other problems. Require property rectification, but the property is not active and no practical action is taken. And then sent it with other owners? What can't be done, take the first place with money? Pennant. After review by the court, it was determined that the contents of Ms. Wang's banner did conform to the property. Related ills are also evidenced by photos and objects. But this way of safeguarding rights is not very reasonable. Therefore, Ms. Wang was awarded property compensation and apologized.

2. Is it reasonable or not? I think it's hard to say such a judgment. From a legal point of view, it is indeed reasonable. But we have to consider the specific situation. If Ms. Wang's rights protection method is wrong, which method should she use to protect her rights? Now the property is basically like this. And Ms. Wang's statement is also true. I think the court should make a claim for property by the way when making a judgment. Instead of just punishing Ms. Wang.

3. Pay attention to the way of safeguarding rights. Pay more attention to your own ways when defending your rights. Taking Ms. Wang's residential area as an example, there are a series of problems such as house cracking, garage leakage and cement falling, which can be confirmed. As long as the rights are protected in the right way, of course, the property can be punished. Sending banners can only ridicule the property and has no substantive effect. But now most properties are doing this, and I hope the relevant departments can give reasonable solutions to ensure the rights of owners.