What is the reason why the Supreme Law requires that residential properties should not force owners to brush their faces in and out?

Yang Wanming, vice president of the Supreme People's Court, said that in recent years, with the rapid development of information technology, face recognition has gradually penetrated into all aspects of people's lives. While bringing convenience to social life, the problem of personal information protection brought by face recognition technology has become increasingly prominent. Some operators abuse face recognition technology to infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of natural persons frequently, which has aroused widespread concern and concern of the public.

Face information belongs to the biometric information of sensitive personal information, and it is the personal information with the strongest social attribute and the easiest to collect. It is unique and unchangeable. Once leaked, it will cause great harm to personal and property safety, and may even threaten public safety.

Article *** 16 of the Regulations regulates the application of face recognition technology from the aspects of tort liability, contract rules and litigation procedures. The reporter noted that the "Regulations" specifically issued relevant regulations to regulate the problems of forcing car owners to "brush their faces" and some apps not being granted "brush their faces" permissions.

Terms:

Paragraph 10 of Article/kloc-0 of the Regulations clearly stipulates: "Property service enterprises or other building managers use face recognition as the only verification method for owners or property users to enter and leave the property service area. If the owner or property user who disagrees requests him to provide other reasonable verification methods, the people's court shall support him according to law. "

According to this regulation, when a residential property uses the face recognition access control system to input face information, it should obtain the consent of the owner or the property user. In case of disagreement, the residential property shall provide alternative verification methods, and shall not infringe upon the personality rights and other legitimate rights and interests of the owners or property users.

In addition, in order to better regulate the property service enterprises or other managers, prevent them from leaking face information or infringing on the privacy of owners or property users, and form a comprehensive protection for owners and other property users to use face information.

Paragraph 2 of Article 10 further clarifies: "If a property service enterprise or other building manager has the circumstances specified in Article 2 of these Provisions, and the parties request the property service enterprise or other building manager to bear the tort liability, the people's court shall support it according to law."

The above contents refer to the judicial interpretation issued by xiaoxiang morning herald-the Supreme People's Court, and it is clear that the owners shall not be forced to "brush their faces" in the future.