Can the property staff be the staff of the owners' meeting?

Property employees can't be the staff of the owners' meeting, which is my straightforward answer.

Owners' meeting is a meeting held in the community for the environment of the community to discuss various matters of the community (such as whether it is necessary to sign a contract with a property company to outsource the property of the community). The owners' meeting is usually undertaken by the standing staff of the owners' meeting (that is, the staff of the owners' meeting, usually the community owners or neighborhood committees), and the resolutions are implemented by the standing staff of the owners' meeting (for example, the standing staff should contact the working group to improve the greening of the community (usually outsourced to outside contractors). Property (refers to the property company) is handed over to the property company by the owners' meeting, and the property staff is the executor of the property company. It can be said that the property staff belongs to the property but not to the owners' meeting, and the property staff has no right to interfere with the owners' meeting, and some property staff are not from the community. If so, let me make an analogy, which is easy to understand: like our country, the National People's Congress is the owners' meeting, and the property is the State Council. But the property is not ours in the State Council, but contracted to foreign the State Council. We can give them something to do, but we can't let them enter the decision-making body.

So I said that property employees can't be the staff of the owners' meeting, which is the decision-making body. If property employees enter the owners' meeting, it is the decision of outsiders to intervene in the community. Will you let outsiders decide your housework? No, it's absolutely impossible. This is my answer and the reason for this answer.