Owner's epidemic prevention statement

Shijiazhuang is currently carrying out anti-epidemic activities. It is revealed on the Internet that a property is taking photos of volunteers for publicity, and volunteers are forced to write on protective clothing? Not real estate? . But then the residential property responded that the matter was not reported on the Internet, and specifically pointed out that legal affairs might be used to protect rights. Because according to the property, the incident did cause some damage to the image of their property and put them at a moral disadvantage, so if the negotiation fails, they will use legal means to defend their rights.

First, this incident has caused some damage to the image of the property.

For the property, now is the key stage of the fight against the epidemic, and any negative report about the fight against the epidemic will arouse people's indignation. In this case, if once it is true, they take photos of volunteers to promote themselves, then they will face accusations from all sides, so their image will plummet, not only will they become street rats on the Internet, but owners may also distrust the property after seeing the news. This is also the reason why they are eager to adopt the way of safeguarding rights. Moreover, after doing so, on the one hand, people can see their tough attitude and highlight their self-confidence, thus telling all parties that the incident is false. On the other hand, they can also save their image.

Second, the theft propaganda incident put the property at a moral disadvantage.

In the eyes of netizens, volunteers are going to help the property fight the epidemic and solve their troubles of understaffing. But the property, in turn, uses photos to decorate its face with gold, which is indeed an immoral behavior and puts the property at a moral disadvantage in public opinion. Therefore, the property will also use legal rights protection to get rid of its moral disadvantages and strive to occupy more initiative.

But in any case, when the property chooses to solve the problem through legal rights protection, they have actually lost, because this will give people a feeling of forcing volunteers, so in my opinion, they actually have a better way to solve this matter, rather than using legal rights protection.