What do you think of the property owners issuing bad review banners and the property withdrawing from community service?

That's right. Dual supervision of property and owners. First of all, shopkeepers don't send bad reviews banners for no reason. The owner and the property are neither peers nor enemies, and there is no conflict of interest. As a property, if you serve the community well, it is not good. There is nothing to say. It's because you didn't ask me to praise you, so if you praise, you should praise, and of course you should scold the bad reviews.

Most properties serve people reasonably, legally and humanely, but there are always a small number of properties that commit crimes against the wind, not for the purpose of serving the community, but only for collecting money. In some second-and third-tier cities, there is no property office at all, only a parking lot security guard, regardless of the parking lot order. However, this security guard is the rhetoric of property charging property fees. If you don't pay, you are forbidden to enter the parking lot. There are too many such properties in second-and third-tier cities. The same property staff serves several communities, and every community can't find a property when something goes wrong, but when you collect money, the property appears like a god. As soon as they appear, they ask for property fees, and if they don't pay them, they take the measures they say. The answer that the masses got when they went to the relevant departments to vote for demolition was nothing more than? We are communicating with it. ?

It is easy to make the owners feel embarrassed, but after the owners reported the situation to the relevant departments, there was no news. Therefore, although the practice of issuing bad review banners is extreme, it is the only way for the masses to resist. A small number of properties forget that they are serving the masses, and don't even look at the problems of the masses with a cold face. Why is there such a service system? If the property management service mode is incorrect, where should the masses react? Where can I give a solution?

A few owners regard the property as a wallet, and any minor changes in the property in the community can reach out and ask the owners for money. This is wrong, but the masses have no choice but to have a third party to handle the corrections of both sides fairly, otherwise what can the masses do?