The official responded that the owner was isolated when he unlocked the door, and what responsibility should he bear for forcibly breaking the door?

According to the official account of WeChat published in Liwan, Guangzhou, on July 8th, in the nucleic acid detection and screening of Hailong Street in our district, it was found that COVID-19 was positive among the residents of Banghua Star Apartment. According to epidemic prevention requirements and risk judgment, the two apartments are high-risk areas. On July 9, after repeated investigation and comparison, it was found that there were still close contacts hiding at home except those who had been transferred and isolated, and some of them were positive for COVID-19 nucleic acid that night. In order to prevent the emergence of new community connections, and realize "all rows are exhausted" and "all districts are exhausted" as soon as possible, in the early morning of July 10, Hailong Street, community neighborhood committees and property management staff conducted an emergency investigation on 84 households on key floors again. In the whole video, they opened the doors one by one and closed them immediately after the investigation. At the same time, the periphery of the building will be fully enclosed, 24-hour duty will be strengthened to ensure the safety of residents' property, and new locks will be installed for residents one after another.

The above-mentioned emergency household survey is simple and rude, ignoring the feelings of residents and hurting the feelings of the masses. After the incident, the person in charge of Hailong Street apologized to the residents one by one, admitted their mistakes and promised compensation.

Our district is deeply saddened by this simple and rude wrong behavior in epidemic prevention and control, and sincerely apologizes to residents and citizens! After the incident, our district has set up an investigation team as soon as possible to conduct a comprehensive and in-depth investigation. According to the investigation results, the relevant personnel will be dealt with seriously according to the law and discipline, and at the same time, we will learn a profound lesson and draw inferences from others to resolutely put an end to similar situations from happening again.

What is the responsibility for forcibly breaking the door? According to the relevant laws and regulations, forcibly entering other people's houses without the owner's consent has constituted the crime of trespassing. However, if these owners jointly appeal, it is unlikely that the residential property will be sentenced. Generally speaking, those who illegally enter other people's houses will face more than three years' imprisonment. However, because the residential property has not illegally invaded other people's houses and violated relevant laws, this phenomenon can only be punished according to the Public Security Administration Punishment Law for more than 10 days.

Some people think that if there is no loss and mutual understanding in a special period, the staff must learn from it! As long-term service and epidemic monitoring staff, some people are unconscious and have been notified. They are also close contacts, and they are also positive when found. Why don't they report hiding at home?

The selfishness of many people is also terrible, and that way of thinking is intolerable, so it is necessary to understand these staff, so what if they don't do it! Those who make irresponsible remarks about the staff, let these positive secret contacts live in your community and your building, you must go further than the medical staff!

But some people think that epidemic prevention can override the law? Is it reasonable to break into a house without permission? It is stipulated that indoor disinfection should be communicated with the owner. Does it go in one ear and out the other? Epidemic prevention is not a reason to ignore the existence of the law. Breaking the lock and disinfecting the room without the owner's consent has violated the law and violated the rights and interests of citizens. The relevant personnel must be held accountable. Breaking and entering houses is against the law. The correct way should be for the owner to wear protective clothing to open the door himself or authorize the key to open the door.