Is it necessary to re-sign the property service contract?

According to the regulations, if all the owners agree unanimously and decide not to set up the owners' meeting, the owners shall perform the duties of the owners' meeting and the owners' committee. Therefore, as a single owner, you can also sign a property service contract with the property management company (in fact, it is the responsibility to replace the owners' meeting), but it does not mean that you are not qualified to sign it. Extremely (so well understood), what if there is only one owner in a single property?

As a standard management, of course, it is best to sign a property contract, which will protect the interests of both parties. Once there is an accident in service provision, there is a basis to investigate the corresponding responsibilities. Of course, if you think their management is ok now, you don't want to sign it for fear of trouble, but it is not recommended.

If you sign a property service contract, you will mainly pay attention to two places:

1. What is the service standard provided by the property management company? The finer the service standard, the better. At the same time, it is very important to see whether the service standard is what you want and whether there is a gap with it now.

Second, how did the cost of the property management company come from? In other words, what services should the property management fee agreed in the contract include? Are there any other fees besides the property management fee? For example: maintenance fund, collection and payment, etc. These expenses should be clearly understood in advance to avoid making both parties unhappy because of the cost after the contract is signed.