The owner was sentenced to apologize and compensate for sending a banner to the property. Why?

Because the owner has really gone too far, you send such a mocking banner, regardless of whether the other party is dereliction of duty or not, you constitute slander and have violated the reputation right of the property company. Although they do this for a reason, they should use legal channels to safeguard their rights, and more contradictions with property companies should be resolved through communication. After all, in the same community, it is best not to make the relationship so stiff.

In fact, this news reflects a very common problem in today's society. Modern young people will choose to buy a house in the city after marriage, so it is inevitable that they will form a certain degree of management relationship with the relevant property companies here, but this relationship is not absolute. After all, property still belongs to the service industry. Once the residents are dissatisfied, if the property can be solved in time and perfectly, then the two sides can maintain a good relationship. However, many unscrupulous companies really put interests first, and only when the money is in place can they help you solve your problems, which is also the dissatisfaction of many owners.

So is this news. There are stones falling off the outer wall of Ms. Wu's house, and other residents in the same building have similar problems. Considering the potential safety hazard, Ms. Wu and Mr. Wang asked the property to report the problem as soon as possible, and the professional construction team came to repair it. This is a very reasonable requirement. But the property has been delayed for two months until they hand over the house? Commendation? Banner, the construction team took action to repair the wall after the situation expanded, so why did you leave early? This shows that the property does not take the owners seriously, and it is no wonder that they do so.

So for the whole thing, I think the first thing is that the property is at fault and the owner's misconduct is excusable. However, it is a bit excessive for the property to sue two households and ask them to compensate 500 thousand for infringement. So in the end, in support of the court decision, the two households should apologize to the property company. But they are also encouraged to appeal. After all, this 500 thousand is also a waste of money.

In fact, similar things are very common in China communities, but this incident came into everyone's sight through banners. If you ask me, the property company does not have a clear position, and this contradiction will always exist. Think about it. If you treat your residents with a service attitude, they will certainly understand you and actively cooperate with your work. But if you pretend to be a manager and ignore the interests of the owners in order to make money, they will certainly not give you a good look. After all, I don't live in your house.