Job Recruitment Website - Property management company - Whose responsibility did the courier lose at the door of the community?

Whose responsibility did the courier lose at the door of the community?

Legal analysis: concrete analysis of specific problems. From the point of view of the courier company, the consignee is stated on the courier list, and the consignee personally signs the parcel. If the courier delivers the parcel to someone else for collection without the consent of the consignee, it shall be deemed that he has not fulfilled his obligation to deliver the parcel, and the courier company shall be responsible for the loss of the parcel and the damage to the goods. From the perspective of residential property, the property company should have an entrustment relationship with the owner when collecting express parcels. If the owner does not authorize the property company to sign the parcel on behalf of the property company, it shall fulfill the obligation of custody; The property management company collects the parcel with the consent of the owner. If there is a problem with the parcel, the owner himself will bear certain responsibilities.

Legal basis: Civil Code of People's Republic of China (PRC).

Article 888 A custody contract is a contract in which the depository keeps the deposit delivered by the depositor and returns it. Where the depositor goes to the custodian to engage in shopping, catering, accommodation and other activities, and stores the goods in a designated place, it shall be regarded as custody, unless otherwise agreed by the parties or there are other trading habits.

Article 889 The depositor shall pay the safekeeping fee to the custodian as agreed. If the parties have not agreed on the storage fee or the agreement is unclear, and it cannot be determined according to the provisions of Article 510 of this Law, it shall be regarded as free storage.

Article 897 Where the deposit is damaged or lost due to improper safekeeping by the depository, the depository shall be liable for compensation. However, if the unpaid custodian proves that he has no intention or gross negligence, he shall not be liable for compensation.