Now that the rural areas are planned as a whole, is it reasonable to collect garbage according to the number of household registration?

Beautiful countryside has been building in the countryside for several years! Many rural areas have not only built roads, squares and supporting greening, but also introduced rural garbage sorting systems. Since then, such rural areas have bid farewell to the mess of the past and the living environment in rural areas has been greatly improved! However, near the end of the year, farmers broke out in various places to pay different amounts of health fees or garbage fees. Will they pay them? If you pay, how can you charge more reasonably?

Should rural health fees be paid?

This problem cannot be generalized. Nowadays, the construction of new countryside is going on, and the rural ecological environment is improving. Rural garbage can't be littered at will. Fixed-point management, cleaning by special personnel and daily cleaning have really changed the old dirty appearance of rural areas and greatly improved the living environment in rural areas, which can be said to benefit all farmers. Then, this special person will involve labor costs. In rural areas, several people who are older or physically unable to do other heavy work will be arranged to clean up, and some financial subsidies will be given, which not only solves the basic sources of livelihood of these people, but also solves the environmental problems in rural areas. However, where does this financial subsidy come from?

In our countryside, the county and township finance is responsible for the unified cost of garbage removal to the garbage dump, but the village is responsible for the cost of sending the garbage point to the centralized garbage removal point. Because this part of the cost is not big, if there is a collective economy in the village, it is generally the collective responsibility of the village. However, the village collective economy shell village, can't let the village cadres pad this part of the cost? According to the principle that all villagers are beneficiaries, the money should naturally be shared by all villagers. Therefore, from the point of view, it is more reasonable to collect health fees from villagers in villages where the village collective has no income.

However, there are always some people in the countryside who love to be true. Whoever benefits pays the bill. I don't need you to collect garbage, okay? I send my own garbage to a centralized clearing place, so I don't have to pay this money, do I? However, in addition to collecting garbage, people have to clean the streets. You can't help walking on clean streets, can you? It is said that people in society should not be so serious. In order to save a few dollars, it takes time and effort to send garbage every day, and it is also looked down upon by everyone. Is it interesting? Living in the countryside, we must have good humanity, find a partner for our children, and people have to ask about it. If your humanity can't stand questioning, it may bring a lot of inconvenience.

How to collect rural health fees to make people feel reasonable?

In fact, nothing is absolutely fair and reasonable The city collects property fees according to the housing area. However, property cleaning and management does not necessarily mean that a large housing area will have more garbage or consume more water and electricity. A big house does not necessarily have a large population and needs more management than others. But no one can resist such a rule. People who live in big houses are richer, so maybe they don't care about this unfairness. City property fees, as long as the key is paid, regardless of decoration and living, property fees are charged. Some people decorate late, and the house has been idle for several years and has to pay property fees. Is this unreasonable? But this is how people collect money. If you don't pay it, it may be inconvenient for you on electricity and water during the renovation.

At present, most rural health fees are charged according to population. In fact, this can only be said to be a basic and reasonable charging method, but it is not completely fair and reasonable. In fact, the rural health expenses are the living garbage disposal expenses and street cleaning expenses, which are mainly related to the population and have nothing to do with the land, so it is basically reasonable to charge according to the population.

However, according to the registered population, what if there are foreigners renting a house? No household registration, no garbage? Those who have registered their household registration live outside all the year round, generally do not go home to live, do not produce garbage, and do not walk in the streets of rural areas, which makes it a bit unfair for people to pay health fees. Some people say that you are from this village. Although I rarely go back to the village, I register in the village and enjoy other benefits in the village. It is also appropriate to make this contribution to the village. It's easy to talk standing up. If you don't pull someone's leg, you won't make a phone call If you are away from home all the year round, you are unwilling to pay this fee.

Therefore, how to collect rural health expenses is reasonable? This should be comprehensively converted, mainly based on the rural population who live at home all the year round, combining the rural population with housing, the rural population and the permanent population renting houses in rural areas. First of all, the rural population who stay at home all the year round accounts for most of the health expenses, and those who work outside the home all the year round can also be counted. However, if they want to go home for a period of time on holidays, they will be charged monthly according to the length of their residence, and less than one month will be counted as one month. The migrants who rent houses in the village are the same as those who live in the village all the year round. At the same time, because rural streets are composed of all houses, houses should be converted into part of the cost, and several houses should be calculated according to several houses.

Although this charging method is difficult, it is fair and reasonable. For example, the health expenses in the village need 1 10,000 yuan a year, so it can be converted into 7,000 yuan according to the population, and this 7,000 yuan can be shared equally by the permanent residents of the village and the permanent residents of other villages. The monthly expenses that each person should pay can be determined according to the actual situation and with reference to the monthly expenses of the village population. Because this money is very small, it can be accumulated by the collective as a bonus for the cleaning staff at the end of the year. After paying 3000 yuan, you can count all the houses in the village. No matter whether people live or not, all the houses will be divided equally and paid by the owner. As for renting a house, both parties can negotiate whether the fee is paid by the original owner or the renter.

In a word, rural health charge is a sensitive issue. There are indeed many farmers, especially elderly farmers, who are unwilling to pay this part of the fee because of their poor living conditions. Therefore, the charging scheme must be as fair and reasonable as possible.