The total ban on pets in the community has caused dissatisfaction among Qingdao owners. How to treat this rule?

Pets are good friends of mankind. Some people are afraid to communicate with others, so they regard pets as their best friends. Some people even treat their pets as their own children, and they are especially fond of them. But now owners have various problems in keeping pets, causing social disputes. They insist on a total ban on pets in their own communities, which leads to the dissatisfaction of Qingdao owners. This is a very typical example.

With the development of urban civilization, people pursue a higher quality living environment. Some people don't like keeping pets, and some people especially like keeping pets, which has attracted some controversy. Because pets are especially like walking dogs in an environment like a city, puppies will defecate everywhere in the community, which will affect the cleanliness of the community. In this respect, this phenomenon does exist. However, from a rational point of view, since we are also animals, then people will have physiological needs. How can animals not have such needs? As long as the owner can ensure that the puppy does not defecate anywhere, does not disturb public places, and does not pose a safety hazard to people and children in the community, he thinks that people should be supported to keep pets. Many people are so lonely that pets are essential to them. At this point, we should consider them.

All the rules are for a better life. If too many owners are injured by pets, it is not a humanized rule. The core of such a rule is not people, so it has no practical significance. I think the community can choose to formulate a more reasonable regulation to deal with the issue of keeping pets leniently, such as setting a time for owners to walk their pets and supervising pets not to defecate anywhere, so that pets can also be protected humanely and get a fairer living environment without affecting others.

Community regulations should be considered in the management of the community? Is it also for the owners of the community? People who enter the community want to have a stable life? Because of such an unreasonable rule, their good life was ruined? So the management of this community is unqualified? !