An owner in Nanjing forcibly fell to death through an electric door, and his family claimed 640,000 yuan. How did the court finally decide?

The owner of a residential area in Nanjing forced through the electric door, only to fall off the car. He fell and died. His family took the property to court and claimed 640,000 yuan. The court finally ruled that the property was not responsible and the deceased himself was fully responsible.

Now many communities have set up automatic doors. As long as the access card is used, the owner can go in and out at any time, which is very convenient. However, there are many people entering and leaving the card. It is very dangerous to follow others in and out of the community after using the access card.

A landlord in Nanjing forcibly fell to death through an electric door.

An automatic door is used in a residential area in Nanjing, and the owner uses the access card to get in and out by himself. An owner rushed out after the previous owner used the access card and wanted to drive out of the community door with the previous owner. Unexpectedly, the electric door slowly began to close at this time. Knocked down the owner who wanted to come out and fell directly to the ground. After a period of treatment, the master finally passed away.

Family claim 640 thousand

I didn't expect to lose my life because I rushed out. No one wants to see such an accident. However, the owner's family believes that because the property has not fulfilled its safety responsibilities. So he took the property to court and demanded that the property compensate for various losses, totaling more than 600,000 yuan.

The accident was caused by the owner's forced passage without seeking the help of the property. It really has nothing to do with the property, it is entirely caused by the owners themselves.

How did the court finally decide?

The court accepted the lawsuit of the owner's family, but after investigation and evidence collection, it was found that the property was not at fault. To a great extent, it ensures the safety precautions of the owner, such as safety tips, such as setting manual buttons under the car door and so on. Therefore, the court finally ruled that the property was not responsible, and more than 600,000 lawsuits claimed by family members were also rejected.