On property residents' autonomy

Specifically, in a community of two thousand households with six or seven thousand people, there are only two small doors for pedestrians and cyclists. Grandparents take their children to school four times a day. Every time I go to the small door, it is either blocked or crowded. The reason is that the small door is equipped with an automatic door closer. You have to put a card on it to open it. It seems that this can restrict people outside the community from coming in. In fact, after people with cards opened the door, a bunch of people crowded in, which not only failed to identify restrictions, but caused a lot of congestion and congestion. Even when your bike just passed by, the electric door closer just turned on the tiemenguan and caught you and your bike. If you don't card, you have to card. I want to ask, is this facility only for cardholders? What's the use? Property companies, like this electric door closer, have no good effect, but have the opposite effect. It should be cancelled.

How to manage the science in the community reasonably and thoughtfully without being reactionary is the substantive issue that everyone is most concerned about. As for who cares, of course, one layer can be reduced, the efficiency can be improved by one level and the cost can be reduced. Those effective and reasonable functions in the original property management must be retained, and those unreasonable and even redundant functions with negative effects must be removed. Therefore, it needs to be fully discussed and decided by the owners (or residents) Committee under the leadership of community organizations. Give full play to the advantages of democratic centralism, how can we not manage it well? The person in charge of the owners' committee is appointed by the community, and the members of the owners' committee are composed of representatives of all buildings and ages in the community, and are also confirmed and replaced by the community. To adapt to different communities, different situations and requirements.

The owners' committee implements the amateur regular meeting system.

Community management community, management fees, of course, from property fees and advertising fees. "Detailed disclosure of the use of property fees" should be implemented. The names of the members of the owners' committee, especially the names of the representatives of each building, are also made public.

Abolishing property and implementing residents' autonomy, just like the autonomy of rural villagers' committees in those days, is a development trend and a development direction. Although the current property management company is under the supervision of the owners' committee, the owners' committee is different from the residents' committee and does not have the universality of residents. The community is a residential community. Every square meter of greening and pool area is bought by the owner, and the state confirms it in advance in the form of property right certificate. Moreover, it is unreasonable for the property company to charge fees from it. They are all in favor of abolishing property companies and implementing residents' autonomy.