Vanke property employees savagely collect money. Should such behavior be severely punished?

Don't listen to the owner questioning the water and electricity charges. The purpose of the property staff is to urge the payment, not to listen to the explanation, not to face up to the problem, and to muddle through. He is like a debt collector, chasing the owner to intercept and collecting property fees as arrears.

The voice is very loud. He wants to overshadow the hostess and make people who don't know believe what he said, which is damaging her reputation. Similar? Shameless? Do you have to pay? Why not pay the fee? Such words are inappropriate. He kept exporting, threatening the hostess through repeated words, and it seemed that oil and salt could not get in, so that the hostess could not communicate with him. He thinks this way can make the hostess compromise. The hostess said she couldn't talk, and when she was about to close the door, she even said so? I'll be back later, okay? You didn't pay on purpose? These words give people fear and pressure. When the hostess asked him to tell her husband, the answer was actually? You are the property owner, why don't you pay the fee? He refused to communicate with her husband. It seems that he is a little guilty and has the psychology of deliberately bullying weak women. Why doesn't he want to communicate with the owner's husband about payment? Is this deliberate bullying of weak single women the style of this property? It's really hard to understand that the hostess only asks to pay the property fee when she is at home.

Because the property itself is a service industry, people who do the service industry should be very clear about their starting point and positioning. If you can't help others to serve others with the initial intention of serving others, this road will not work for them. They feel more pain and pressure in the process of work than real happiness. If we can start from the beginning and keep humanity, we will have more fun in this work. From a smile, a help and a thank you, we will be happy all day.

Now many people are dissatisfied with the property. I think both sides have reasons, but the property should be more tolerant. Since the property has received the property fee paid by others, it should serve others. As the owner, I hope the living environment can be quieter, and the property can provide me with a warmer residential environment. This is what property should do, not what they can do. If the property can keep this concept in mind, they won't have so many.

However, there are too many contradictions. When recruiting property, each community should also fully consider whether it can serve the owners well. After all, as an owner, I really hope that my money can be reflected and I can enjoy a more peaceful life, instead of getting up every day to face parked cars and advertisements posted at random, and I am at a loss about the wall. This kind of life is not what the owner needs, but also what a property should guarantee.