Job Recruitment Website - Property management company - I lost my bike in the corridor. Is the residential property liable for compensation?

I lost my bike in the corridor. Is the residential property liable for compensation?

Baidu has a very clear answer to this question. First of all, you should make sure whether your property has signed a vehicle storage agreement with the property. Second, the property company that signed the property custody agreement shall make compensation according to the relevant payment terms.

What is not signed belongs to the category of property management service contract. The first is to determine whether it belongs to the property management regulations. If there are provisions on vehicle management in the property service contract, does the owner cooperate with the property management? Whether the property has managed the vehicles in accordance with relevant regulations. Whether there is evidence that the fault of the property management company is caused by the fault of the lost vehicle. That is to say, whether the property management company has carried out vehicle management according to the contract, such as security patrol and guard duty, and whether the monitoring equipment is operating normally. If there is evidence that the property fails to perform these responsibilities and the vehicle is stolen, the property shall bear the responsibility.

Division of responsibilities: thieves+property companies+owners jointly bear the liability for compensation. The value of the goods is: the equivalent value of the goods divided by the depreciation period multiplied by the allocation ratio. The general property here is responsible for about 30%. That is to say, if the property with a value of 1 1,000 yuan is used 1 year, the depreciation expense for one year will be removed. If it is scrapped for two years in five years, the value of the car is 600 yuan * 30% = 1.80 yuan, which is the compensation borne by the property. But in this process, the actual work is greater than the reward. It is also difficult to get evidence of property negligence here. Is not worth the loss.