Be sued for refusing to pay property fees due to poor property service.

In real life, there are many reasons why owners refuse to pay property fees, such as stolen vehicles and poor quality of property services. However, as long as the property company has fulfilled the corresponding contractual obligations, there is no reason for the owner to refuse to pay the property fee on this ground. Under normal circumstances, even if the service of the property itself is not good, the law will tend to the property side because there is no substantive evidence in the hands of the owner. As for the place where the property is not in place, I suggest you use a camera, mobile phone, etc. Collect evidence in an emergency. It is a basic contractual obligation of the owner to pay the property management fee according to the agreement, and it is a breach of contract not to pay the property management fee without sufficient defense reasons. However, in the following cases, the owner may refuse to pay the property fee: 1, and the service quality provided by the property management company cannot meet the standard agreed in the contract; 2, the property company without authorization to expand the scope of charges, raise fees, repeated charges; 3. The property management company increases the charging items without the consent of the owner. If the services provided by the property management company fail to meet the standards stipulated in the contract, the service quality is not in place. There is a problem that the service quality is inconsistent with the charging price. Obviously, the property company is in breach of contract at this time. Owners can directly negotiate with the property company through the owners' committee, and even hire other property companies to manage the community according to the contract. Legal basis: Article 108 of the Contract Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) refuses to perform the contractual obligations, and if one party expressly or by his own behavior shows that he will not perform the contractual obligations, the other party may require him to bear the liability for breach of contract before the expiration of the performance period.