Residential installation monitoring must be shared equally by business households. Is it suitable?

In principle, it should be paid by all owners.

Because the property service contract signed by the property was only to provide services. The cost composition of property fees is only some period expenses incurred in providing services, such as office electricity, water and personnel expenses, excluding equipment. The ultimate ownership of these technical defense equipment is also shared by all owners, so it should be shared by the owners in principle.

But from the owner's point of view, there is definitely doubt. There is a blind spot in monitoring, which leads to problems in community security. Property should be compensated from the perspective of management. When the property takes over the management of the community, it is necessary to evaluate these technical defense equipment and think that it can be taken over. If there is a blind spot, then the default property admits that there is a way to solve this problem by itself.

This situation is like going to a restaurant, where you have ordered good food and even paid for it. The restaurant suddenly said that the pots and pans in the kitchen were broken. Please add some money, and we will buy it. If you don't get a refund after use, you can take these pots home.

The owner can refuse, and it is the responsibility of the property to monitor the blind area and cause loopholes in the security of the community. The property should be made up by the original developer. Of course, 99% of the possible developers will not pay the bill, so you have already taken over the property.