Is it the responsibility of the property to pry open the door of the community?

Legal analysis: If the community is completely closed, there are security patrols, the door of the commercial house located downstairs in the community is pried open, and two electric cars are taken away, the property is responsible and should be liable for compensation. If there is no provision in the property contract, the community is not closed. In case of theft, the community has little responsibility, but only helps to protect the scene and report the case to the public security organ in time.

Legal basis: People's Republic of China (PRC) Criminal Law.

Article 264 Whoever steals a large amount of public or private property, or repeatedly steals, enters a house, carries a weapon or pickpockets, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and shall also, or shall only, be fined; If the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years and shall also be fined; If the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment, and shall also be fined or confiscated.

Article 265 Whoever, for the purpose of making profits, steals another person's communication line, copies another person's telecommunication code number or uses the telecommunication equipment or facilities knowingly stolen or copied shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of Article 264 of this Law.