Cangzhou Golden Hair was beaten. Who is more reasonable, the dog owner or the property?

65438+1October 15, two security guards in a residential area in Lincang, Yunnan Province slammed a golden retriever with wooden sticks, and the golden retriever was beaten to the ground and rolled and screamed. Then the security guard dragged the golden retriever to the open area and continued to beat it until it was lying unconscious on the ground. Later, a kind person sent the golden retriever to a nearby pet hospital for treatment. The doctor in the pet hospital found that the golden retriever had a comminuted skull fracture and his nose and legs were also broken. Even if it can be saved, it will be a disabled dog in the future.

After this happened, it caused everyone's discussion. Some people think that the owner of the dog is at fault, while others think that it is the responsibility of the community security. I think both sides have unshirkable responsibilities in this incident. Obviously, both sides have not considered it carefully and tried their best. Both sides are at fault.

Wrong behavior of dog owner

It is reported that the dog owner called the golden retriever from upstairs, put it in the community to play in the sun, and then went back to his home upstairs to rest. The dog owner didn't fix the golden retriever with a leash, nor did he put a muzzle on the golden retriever to let him play freely in the community and bask in the sun. It can be seen from this that the dog owner has obvious fault behavior, because the dog may bite if it is not tied with a rope.

Many people say that Golden Retriever is the most docile dog, and it never bites or hurts people, so it's nothing even if it's not tied. If someone has this idea, it means that he will never tie a rope when walking his dog. There have been reports of injuries caused by golden retriever before, so as the owner of golden retriever, he should fulfill the corresponding management responsibilities. He put the golden retriever in the sunshine of the community, at least he should tie it up with a rope, and he put the golden retriever directly in the public place of the community without corresponding management, so the dog owner also has corresponding responsibilities for this matter.

The wrong behavior of the security guard

When the security guard patrolled the community, he found a golden retriever with no leash and no owner around. At this time, the two men found a wooden stick and punched the golden retriever. This is also wrong. Although according to the relevant management regulations of the property, the community security guards have the right to manage the dogs that the owners have not kept according to the regulations, this management does not include arbitrary beating of the dogs. When the security guards in the community find a golden retriever without a leash, they must first see if they can contact its owner. If they can contact the dog owner and ask him to tie the golden retriever, then they can criticize and educate the dog owner.

If the security guard can't contact the owner of Golden Retriever, the most correct way is to send someone to take care of Golden Retriever to prevent it from injuring people by mistake, and then call the local stray dog shelter, or call the police or the local urban management. When they arrive, they can manage the golden retriever accordingly, or take it away directly. Therefore, it is wrong for the security guard to hit Jin Mao with a wooden stick after finding that he has no rope.