Whose fault is it that the boy turned off the elevator and killed the girl?

On July 3rd, Lili, a 2-year-old girl, took the elevator to the 8th floor of Hua Ting Community/KLOC-0, and fell to her death. Afterwards, it was found that there was no glass baffle on the guardrail of the lighting area on 18 floor, and when the little girl took the elevator to the ninth floor, she had already stepped out of the elevator and was taken back to the elevator by the 5-year-old boy who was also in the elevator. Then the little girl rose to the 18 floor alone.

According to the lawyer's analysis, both the little boy's guardian and Lili's guardian need to bear certain responsibilities in this matter, and the guardrail in the lighting area has no glass baffle. It is necessary to analyze the specific reasons to determine how the developer and the property should bear the responsibilities.

Lili's father said to the people in the daily newspaper, "What's the point of pursuing responsibility now?"

A 5-year-old boy carried a 2-year-old girl into the elevator, causing her to climb the 18 floor alone and then fall to her death.

On July 3, an old woman was looking for her two-year-old granddaughter Lili in Durui Huating Community, Changsha. With the help of the property and some owners, at about 1 1 in the morning, everyone found Lili on the platform on the second floor of Building 4. At this time, Lili has fallen from 18 floor and is unconscious. She was taken to the hospital and died after being rescued.

Among the owners of the community, some people said that they heard a "bang" in the patio at that time, like the sound of throwing garbage.

Elevator surveillance video shows that before the incident, three children went upstairs together, except two-year-old Lili, a five-year-old boy and a girl on a pulley. The button on the ninth floor of the elevator is open and the little boy can't reach it. He jumped a few times and finally pressed the 18 floor button.

Finally, the elevator stopped at the ninth floor. After the three children got out of the elevator, the little boy picked up Lili again and put her back in the elevator. Then the boy got out of the elevator alone and watched the elevator door close, leaving Lili alone in the elevator. Then the monitoring showed that Lili tapped on the elevator door, and the elevator kept rising until it stopped at 18 floor, and Lili went out alone.

The situation after that is still unknown. Later, it was found that there were Lili footprints on the guardrail in the lighting area of 18 floor, and the original glass baffle on the guardrail was missing. It is speculated that Lili probably climbed the guardrail and fell. The owner said that if there is glass in the lighting area, it is impossible for children to climb it.

Every day, people try to interview the property, and the property refuses to interview on the grounds that lawyers and police have been invited to intervene.

Lawyer's analysis: the 5-year-old boy has no capacity for civil conduct and his parents are responsible.

Zhao, a lawyer of Yunnan Bingjian Law Firm, told daily figures that this incident is a tragedy caused by many reasons and is essentially an infringement.

The 5-year-old boy carried Lili to the elevator on 18 floor, which was a major reason for Lili's falling. However, because the boy is only five years old and belongs to a person without civil capacity, according to the law, if a person without civil capacity causes damage to others, his guardian shall bear civil liability. If the little boy has property in his name, he will pay compensation from his own property. The insufficient part is compensated by the guardian of the little boy.

In addition, Lili's guardian is also responsible for this incident. Judging from the surveillance video, Lili's parents, as Lili's guardians, let Lili, who is only two years old, get out of her control and act alone. It can be seen that they have not fulfilled their guardianship responsibilities.

Regarding the lack of glass baffles in the lighting area, Zhao believes that this requires a concrete analysis of the real reasons for the lack of glass baffles before the person responsible can be determined. Whether there is a problem in the process of architectural design and construction, or whether the property is not maintained in time after the problem occurs in the process of building use, will determine how the developer and the property bear the responsibility.

Xiong Haizi's wounding incidents are not uncommon, and parents have failed to fulfill their guardianship responsibilities.

According to comprehensive public reports, similar cases are not uncommon, but most of them are because the perpetrators have no capacity for civil conduct and their parents are responsible.

On the evening of October 27th, 2065 438+0 13 10, Xiao Huang, who was under the age of 10, played a toy gun shooting game and hit the right eye of 6-year-old Xiao Liu. The doctor diagnosed Liu Xiaowei with traumatic cataract. In this case, the court held that Xiao Huang's parents failed to fulfill their guardianship responsibilities and had to bear full responsibility.

20 16 12 19 At about 6 o'clock in the evening, a boy of 1 1 years old drove a car stolen from the leasing company and killed an innocent passerby named Chen. After the Chen family incident, the boy's parents could not be contacted. At that time, Taicang police said that the driver and his family were responsible for the accident. As the driver has not reached the legal age, the main responsibility is borne by his parents. At the same time, the car rental company should also bear certain responsibilities, because of improper management, the vehicles were driven away without authorization.

20 17 At about 6: 30 pm on July 3rd, an owner of Linbinyuan Community in Binhu New District of Hefei City was hit by a tile falling from the sky, and he was bleeding on the spot. According to police investigation, the perpetrator was an 8-year-old child. That night, he was taken by his family to the police station in the jurisdiction to "surrender". The parents sent an apology letter to the injured neighbor, and the two sides have reached a settlement.