Owners are prohibited from charging for parking in front of the security room.

First of all, it must be explained that, according to reason, the property has no obligation to provide outdoor charging services to the owners (I have encountered this problem with the owners when I was working in the property). There are two reasons: first, the electricity bill, everyone has to charge it once. This is a question, whether this electricity fee is for public use or whether the owner will use it for himself and then share it; Then there is the problem of vehicle safety. Who will be responsible if the car breaks down and is lost when charging outdoors? This is also a problem. Although there are security guards, security guards have their fixed responsibilities. If he is accused, he will have to negotiate with his property manager.

Solution: When negotiating with the property management office through the owners' committee, we need to pay attention to one point (to avoid unnecessary conflicts with the property, because the most inconvenient thing is the owners): if several owners get together to find it, it will be useless, unless all owners participate. Only through the owners' committee or owners' meeting can we decide whether to increase this service and how to increase it.

As for the "stupidity" of security guards, this is easy to handle. Go directly to the property management office to complain. It is best to capture the appearance of security guards violating discipline and making mistakes irresponsibly, or record or take photos with mobile phones as evidence. This is something that the Property Management Office cannot tolerate and will definitely solve. However, to be honest, don't be too hard on the security guard. Nowadays, security guards are young and uneducated, so it is inevitable that they are ignorant and naive.

"The electricity fee for affordable housing is still paid by our owners"-this is easy to handle. Go to the property manager. I think it's a parking safety problem. As long as the property generally deals with the owner, as long as it does not bring trouble to the property or the relationship with the owner is stiff, it will generally be solved. It is also to find you to pay the property fee smoothly.

Friend, you don't know this. If "the property is broken" is an excuse for the property, then they are right.

In addition to monitoring the staff in the duty room, the residential surveillance video can only be watched by the person in charge of the property accompanied by the police, and the owner cannot ask the person in charge of the property to take it directly to watch it, which is more likely to cause disputes.

However, if it is true that the monitoring is broken, then your owner has given up the opportunity to complain or even sue the property. If the surveillance video is broken, the property has the responsibility to repair it or ask the manufacturer to repair it, but they have the responsibility to do so, leading to theft in the community one after another. If they sue, they should bear part of the compensation (but not all the stolen items).