Because the community was not monitored, the child was beaten and the police could not trace it. Is the property responsible?

Legal analysis: the responsibility caused by the neglect of management of property companies is generally obvious. The owner can prove that the doorman is unattended, the management of the doorman is lax, there is no security guard on duty, the security guard is not enough, the electronic monitoring system fails, the closed entrance is not closed, the fence and other enclosure devices collapse, and the maintenance or care is not timely. If the property management company fails to fulfill its security obligations within a reasonable limit, causing personal or property losses to the owners or property users, although the losses are caused by a third party other than the property management contract, the property management company should still be liable for compensation according to the provisions of the Civil Code on third party infringement. If it is confirmed that the negligence of the property company is closely related to the occurrence of criminal cases, and the property company has management faults, it will bear the liability for breach of contract and the criminal will bear the liability for tort.

Legal basis: Article 937 of the Civil Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) is a property service contract in which the property service provider provides the owner with property services such as the maintenance of buildings and ancillary facilities, the management and maintenance of environmental sanitation and related order, and the owner pays the property fee. Property service providers include property service enterprises and other managers.