Changsha property reminds owners

Changsha No.1 business meeting will note that the owner is? Break the rules? It caused a heated discussion, and the property responded that the remarks were written by former employees. This kind of behavior of the property is not allowed by law in love. Does the property remember the owner as? Break the rules? , has violated everyone's right to reputation, name and honor. According to the relevant provisions of China's civil code, the behavior of the property has caused infringement to the owner, so it should bear the corresponding tort liability and compensate the owner for the corresponding losses. In addition, the property should also come to apologize, put an end to such behavior in the future, and return the owner to innocence.

According to the pictures circulating on the Internet, the residential property involved in Changsha, Hunan Province will be noted by the owners as? Break the rules? And some owners have records? Like negative comments in noisy groups? Such things have made many owners angry, and it is simply spending money to find gas. According to the owner, it was the property staff who mistakenly sent the form to the group at that time, and the owner realized that the property was a face-to-face set. After the incident was exposed, the property staff responded that the matter was done by the former housekeeper, not the company's behavior, and one household had apologized.

Although the property came to apologize, the behavior of the property has already involved legal issues. The owner can take legal weapons to protect himself and let the property get the punishment it deserves. According to the relevant provisions of the Tort Liability Law, if the personal rights and interests of others are infringed and serious mental damage is caused to others, the infringed person may request compensation for mental damage. Calling the owner "unruly" in the property has violated the owner's personality right. Although the property is said to be done by former employees, the property still has an unshirkable responsibility. The Civil Code clearly stipulates that the employer shall bear the tort liability if the staff of the employer causes damage to others due to the performance of their work tasks, and the owner may sue the court for compensation. 、

Property was originally a service unit for owners, but now many properties are not in their proper position at all, and many owners are specially managed by various internal classification labels. This practice makes the owners feel chilling, and the contradiction between the owners and the property is getting deeper and deeper.