Which is more difficult, the provincial exam, the big PK interview in public institutions, and the fight?

It is more difficult to interview PK in provincial examinations and institutions. In contrast, it will be more difficult for provincial civil servants to interview.

First, the differences in interview propositions.

1. Civil servants generally use roughly the same procedures and rules for interviewing different positions, which are basically orthodox and structured without leadership. Of course, individual units in the provincial examination will increase semi-structured forms such as behavioral interviews, such as the position of the National Development and Reform Commission in Shanghai. Most of the staff recruited by public institutions are professionals, so they often use structured or supplemented by professional interview questions, and some institutions conduct inspections in a semi-structured form. The word "live", so the majority of candidates should be flexible, because it is easier to select suitable talents; On the other hand, the interview topics of civil servants are broad, representative and extensive, such as closely combining the development planning of this province and the country. For example, please combine your own reality and the position you are applying for to talk about your own views on making mistakes in the country and struggling hard to rejuvenate the country. Relatively speaking, the interview topics of public institutions will be much smaller, will be biased towards local conditions, and will have certain role positioning, such as square dance disturbing the people and residents' complaints. As a street worker, how do you coordinate the handling (20 14, Changning District, Shanghai, June 8). Therefore, the majority of candidates can be a little more partial when collecting information when preparing for the exam, so that they can achieve more than one goal.

2. There are two kinds of recruitment of public institutions: one is combined with the recruitment of provincial civil servants, and the other is independent recruitment of education and health systems. The former, together with civil servants, has the same interview topic and time, while the latter is arranged by the competent department of the unit, and the time is not fixed.

3. The interview of public institutions mainly examines professional skills and practical work ability, while the interview of civil servants mainly focuses on the comprehensive ability to handle official business.

Second, the examiner is different.

1. The interview of public institutions is organized by the superior competent department of the candidate's application unit in conjunction with the examiner group composed of the local personnel department and the leaders of the application unit. The interview of civil servants is organized by the organization department at or above the municipal level, and the examiner group is composed of personnel with interview examiner qualifications.

2. Examiners have different age levels, so their knowledge background and life background will be slightly different, which requires us to treat different types of examiners differently. The examiners for civil service interviews are generally 40-50 years old. Examiners of this age are conservative and pragmatic, so we can't have some new words when answering questions, such as "control", "water", "pro" and "cow bye". At the same time, the content of our answer should be effectively solved, and there should not be too much empty talk and rhetoric. Examiners in public institutions are generally younger and will focus on the post-70s generation. So it is between conservatism and innovation, so as a candidate, you can talk about something ideal and pragmatic to arouse the examiner's interest in you. Chinese public education experts suggest that the majority of candidates can carefully ponder the mystery. As the old saying goes, birds of a feather flock together, which will be an invisible killer for everyone to improve their interview scores.

Third, the types of interview topics are different.

In the interview of public institutions, we pay more attention to our practical ability, so the questions tend to be adaptability, job matching, comprehensive analysis ability (social phenomenon) and interpersonal communication ability, while planning, organization and coordination ability, philosophical comprehensive analysis questions and speeches are rarely investigated.

However, the interview questions of civil servants will be more comprehensive, and generally tend to be comprehensive analysis (philosophy, policies, social phenomena), organizational management, contingency and so on. Even new questions such as speeches and string words will be examined. Therefore, the majority of candidates need to make preparations in advance and understand the key points of the questions, so that candidates can do targeted review in a short time.

Fourth, interview questions have different levels.

Civil servants pay attention to the breadth and depth of answers, while the focus of interviews in public institutions is on novel ideas and clear answers, while paying attention to the brevity and conciseness of answers, because the examiner's endurance in interviews in public institutions is limited. Taking a topic as an example, let's take a look at how to answer questions in an interview in a public institution. Example: On May 1 2065438, the Shanghai Municipal People's Government formulated the Measures for Promoting the Classification and Reduction of Domestic Waste in Shanghai (hereinafter referred to as the Measures). The "Measures" stipulate that if garbage is not classified, it will face a fine: a fine of more than 100 yuan and less than 1000 yuan will be imposed on the unit; Impose a fine of more than 50 yuan and less than 200 yuan on individuals. How to treat this rule?

Obviously, this is a comprehensive analysis of policies. As an interview of a public institution, we need to consider whether this policy is feasible, what is the significance, and how to implement these three sectors. The content is rich enough, and the highlight is nothing more than the analysis of significance and the clarification of opinions. If you can think of the background of Shanghai's policy when you put forward your opinion (Shanghai has a large population and uneven quality, which is a helpless move under the difficulty of garbage classification), then you answered the examiner.

However, the interview of civil servants is about breadth and depth, so it needs to be considered more, such as the background of the introduction and the in-depth analysis of the policy significance (from the improvement of Shanghai's social living environment, the improvement of the overall quality of residents, the promotion of spiritual civilization, the construction of moral fields, etc.). ), as a civil servant, we must have some foresight, so if you think about it carefully, you will find that the implementation of this policy is very difficult and the supervision cost is very high, so it is difficult or even impossible to form a long-term mechanism.

for reference only