Yang Zijiang Pharmaceutical was fined 764 million yuan. What other groups were fined for monopolizing the market?

Yang Zijiang Pharmaceutical was fined 764 million yuan. Yang Zijiang Pharmaceutical is not the first company to be fined for monopolistic behavior. In addition to the pharmaceutical industry, Alibaba and Meituan also imposed fines for monopoly or unfair competition. The difference is that according to the influence of monopoly, the amount of fines is different. Alibaba was fined 1 100 million yuan, Meituan was fined more than 300,000 yuan and Changjiang was fined more than 700 million yuan. The amount is not large, but it also reminds other industries. I hope everyone will abide by the rules of the market economy and not engage in monopolistic behavior.

1. Yang Zijiang Pharmaceutical was fined more than 700 million yuan. During the four or five years from 20 15 to 20 19, Yang Zijiang pharmaceutical group signed some cooperation agreements nationwide, formulated some inappropriate implementation rules, monopolized drug prices and online promotion methods, violated the principle of fair competition, infringed on the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and affected the interests of the public, so it was punished.

Second, the US Mission was fined more than 300,000 yuan for monopoly. In the take-away industry, Meituan and Hungry can be said to be the pillars of the industry, which play a decisive role in the development of foreign sales and occupy a large number of markets. However, in order to monopolize, Meituan took some measures to induce merchants to sign unequal agreements, including exclusive authorization and some unnecessary collocation, which seriously violated the independent choice of merchants and had a negative impact on the development of the market.

Third, Alibaba forced merchants to be either one or the other and was fined 1 100 million yuan. In addition to the US Mission, there is also the Alibaba platform. In fact, the strength of Alibaba is obvious to all, but Alibaba is also very strong. When e-commerce is in full swing, Alibaba requires merchants to choose between Ali and JD.COM platforms, which infringes on the independent choice of merchants and affects the interests of consumers.

(The picture comes from the Internet. If there is any infringement, please contact the author to delete it.