The differences and connections between teacher interview trial lectures and lectures

Most students may still have a lot of confusion about the concepts of "lecture" and "trial lecture". Most of the teacher recruitment interview examinations in various provinces are based on these two forms. As the first step to prepare for the interview, we must understand what lectures and trial lectures are and what are the differences between them. In order to help you better understand the explanation class and the trial class, I will briefly introduce the main differences between the two, so as to provide candidates with targeted review during the exam.

1. Lectures

"Lectures" is not only an innovative teaching and research activity, but also the main content of teachers' professional skills training. So, what exactly is "lecturing"?

"Talking" means that the lecturer uses the viewpoints and methods of system theory to talk about how he plans to teach a certain teaching topic on a certain occasion and why he plans to teach it this way. teaching analysis. In other words, "lecturing" is the teacher's design and analysis of teaching topics. This illustrates the concept that in "lecturing", candidates in the teacher recruitment examination need to regard the examiner they are facing as their "peers", and both of them can discuss how to teach this topic effectively, or "lecturing" The author’s own intention in designing such a class, as well as the course philosophy that runs through it.

2. Trial lecture

The "trial lecture" mainly simulates the class situation on the spot. In the teacher recruitment examination, if you are admitted, you need to regard the examiner below as your own student and give They have certain interactions and exchanges. Compared with "lectures", the most distinctive feature of "trial lectures" is "performance", which requires a question-and-answer session.

It can be seen from the brief introduction of "lecture" and "trial lecture": "Lecture" is difficult in "memorization", while "trial lecture" is difficult in "performance". "Talking" is a pre-class behavior; "lecturing" is a classroom behavior. At the same time, as a candidate who is about to take the teacher recruitment examination, it must be clear that during the lecture within the specified time, a complete lesson must be presented, starting from talking about the teaching materials, talking about the academic situation, talking about the goals, talking about the important and difficult points, teaching and learning methods, The teaching process, teaching tools (means), teaching process, blackboard writing and other steps are fully presented. However, candidates who are asked to interview in the form of a "trial lecture" need to understand that if the "trial lecture" is not completed within the specified time, there is no need to worry too much, because in the "trial lecture", the examiner pays more attention to whether you can Good, relatively perfect presentation of one or two knowledge points.

Since the two are essentially different, is there any connection?

In fact, from the difference between the two, it can be easily analyzed: "lecturing" is "lecturing" foundation and guarantee. It can be said that the quality of "lecture" determines the quality of "lecture". Through "lecturing", a teacher's actual teaching level and teaching research ability can be accurately reflected.