Refuse to carry out the decision of the party organization and give it a warning, right?

Article 63 of the "Regulations on Disciplinary Actions of China Producer Party" violates the principle of democratic centralism, refuses to implement or arbitrarily changes major decisions made by party organizations, or violates the rules of procedure, and individuals or a few people decide major issues, giving warnings or severe warnings; If the circumstances are serious, he shall be dismissed from his post within the Party or be placed on probation.

A typical case of refusing to carry out major decisions of party organizations;

Case: Since 2065438+March 2004, Xiong Ming, as the chief administrative officer of the Urban Management Bureau of huangshigang district City, Hubei Province, refused to implement the requirements of the provincial party committee and the municipal party committee that the "top leader" should not be directly in charge of the finance, personnel, engineering construction, material procurement and other work of local departments, and illegally approved the financial expenses of the bureau, violating organizational discipline. 2065438+In February 2006, the huangshigang district Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection reported to the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and gave Xiong Ming a warning within the Party.

Interpretation: The behavior in the above-mentioned typical cases violated the relevant provisions of the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions in the Communist Party of China (CPC), and was given disciplinary sanctions according to "refusing to implement or arbitrarily changing major decisions of party organizations".