Is there no good job with a low education? Why does every enterprise have academic qualifications for recruitment?

This problem is obvious, because looking at academic qualifications can significantly reduce the cost of judgment when recruiting. I have participated in the recruitment work myself and know many people in the personnel department. Everyone was impressed by their academic qualifications. "Education doesn't mean ability" and "poor education doesn't mean poor ability" is just an example. The most common probabilities in reality are "the higher the educational background, the stronger the ability" and "the better the school, the higher the level". Then our company recruits people, why not choose a low-risk and low-cost judgment method? Why bet on ssr odds?

Now a good job, specifically-a decent job in a big city, the local income is above average, or the enterprise is in a strong state, and the enterprise is not worried that no one will apply. Therefore, for people in the personnel department, how to quickly judge your personal quality level and the upper and lower limits of your personal quality level are the first. We won't discuss the middle and high-level employees who have changed jobs. Let's look at the young employees at the grassroots level. In fact, when recruiting, as long as it is not a highly professional position, the employer will not pay special attention to whether you have a professional counterpart or an internship experience counterpart, because as you said, you can be competent after training, but you can't really recruit people according to the job requirements and seek Excellence, and this is not only a question of whether you can be competent for the current job responsibilities, but also involves enterprises. Therefore, when employers recruit grass-roots employees and fresh graduates, the most important thing is to look at the lower limit of your personal ability and quality, and a good university education basically gives this person a nail in the coffin, and his ability and quality are not bad.

For enterprises, students are picky about 2 1 1985. Why should we consider other ordinary schools? I went to the buffet and the table was filled with abalone, lobster and Angus beef for me to choose from. My stomach is very limited. Do I still have a big bowl of noodles with dregs?

In fact, the recruitment process of many companies is not perfect, some are just going through the motions, and some are flashy. It is impossible to truly show a person's comprehensive quality through the recruitment process, at least the recruitment level of the units I have seen. Therefore, the most effective and simple way to identify this person's ability and quality on his resume is to look at his academic qualifications.

Because the college entrance examination system in our country is relatively fair, we don't rule out all kinds of extra-legal channels to go to college, but don't take an example as an example. Generally speaking, everyone went to a good university and was admitted by themselves. Then under a relatively fair system, there is no doubt that the best among them must be people with outstanding ability.

For example, if we take a resume and look at a 2 1 1985 undergraduate, we can basically draw a conclusion that this person is either very smart or diligent, or has strong execution and self-discipline (listening to the teacher) and a strong sense of responsibility to resist the temptation of the outside world (if you don't learn this question, you won't play). The greatest probability is that he has some of these three points, otherwise, at the same time, this person can go to a famous university, and the education level he received from childhood should not be bad. If he didn't come from a good family, he met a good teacher. So even if he comes from a small place, he will definitely go to a good local primary school and a good middle school, so there is generally no big problem with his vision and pattern. Moreover, such people must be more sensible, know when to do things, and know that the most important thing for students is to study. Then after work, you will know that at this stage of life, it is time to work hard. Smart, diligent, self-disciplined, strong sense of responsibility, strong execution, good vision and understanding of the times, which unit does not need?

Similarly, for example, if we see a person's resume, the undergraduate course is a very ordinary school or even two or three books, and then the graduate student has a formal full-time dual-certificate education 2 1 1985, then we can also draw the conclusion that this person is either not bad at his own level, or failed in the college entrance examination, or worked hard at the university. Which unit doesn't need this kind of person who is thoroughly remoulded after experiencing failure and resists the pressure and doesn't give up under adversity?

For another example, let's look at a person with a doctorate. Then we can at least draw the following conclusion-regardless of academic level, this person must have experienced many research projects and practical projects, so his ability to find problems, collect data and solve problems is guaranteed. Even if the level is worse, he has experienced a complete research process and project process. This kind of person is a ready-made productive force in the unit.

College entrance examination, postgraduate entrance examination and doctoral graduation are basically three Du Jie, and the people killed from them are all tempered.

This is not to belittle three students. Among the students and employees I have contacted, with the passage of time, I found four common problems:

One is laziness. This kind of laziness is reflected in life and work, that is, it is not serious and meticulous, and it will not be meticulous in doing things. Instead, we will choose the most convenient way on the premise of completing the task, and even change the work plan that has been set because of laziness. The details of the work are not guaranteed, and because of laziness, most of them are not recorded, marked or summarized, which leads to a job that will not grow obviously for a long time after it is given to him.

Second, the habit of independent planning is very weak, and the execution is also very poor, and the planned plan is not strictly implemented. Obviously, it was a deal with him, and even taught him to work according to this plan. As a result, he didn't do it, which greatly affected the overall work arrangement.

Third, I can't tell my priorities. You can't tell the priorities, whether it's important or not, whether it's urgent or not, whether it's urgent or not, whether it's urgent or not, whether it's important or not. You want to slap him with a bunch of things and let him plan his work. Often because of doing an unimportant little thing, the important thing that should be done is delayed. Living is inefficient, and all the work can't be finished once it is started.

The fourth is lack of self-discipline. This kind of work, I told you, to achieve this level, don't let me say it again, and then you will automatically work according to the standard of not less than this. As a result, they are often, from the beginning, if you are strict, they can do it without problems. After two times, you stopped staring, and then you started testing on the edge of lowering the quality until you touched the red line, and then you called back and did it strictly according to the requirements. After a few times, you start to test again.

This superposition of 4. 1 is basically an unreliable employee.

So to sum up, for a unit, when recruiting people, the lowest cost, the most reliable and the most accurate point is to look at academic qualifications.