Basic principles of answering interview questions

In the interview field, one of the basic strategies often adopted by examiners is to let candidates talk as much as possible, in order to learn more about what candidates have not reflected in the written materials. The following is what I arranged for you. The following are the basic principles for answering interview questions. I hope it helps you. If you like, you can share it with your friends around you!

Basic principles of answering interview questions

1. Seek truth from facts

Candidates should adhere to the principle of seeking truth from facts when answering questions raised by examiners. As a candidate who may become a national civil servant, seeking truth from facts should be the basic requirement of your life. The same is true for answering questions. Say what you have. Don't brag about what you have done, let alone what others have done. If the candidate is unrealistic in the interview, an experienced examiner can easily detect it. At that time, I'm afraid you will never win the trust of the examiner again. I was once invited by a company to be an interviewer for its external recruitment of deputy managers of various departments. During the interview, one candidate was particularly outstanding, looked experienced and made a good initial impression. When asked about his current job, he said that he was the general manager of a limited liability company, in charge of the company's business decision-making and marketing. I was surprised at that time: why did the general manager of a company want to be the deputy manager of the department in this enterprise? After further questioning, I realized that there are only two people in his so-called company, himself and a partner who "invested" him tens of thousands of yuan. The company has been in a semi-standstill state, and the annual "sales" is only 50,000 yuan. To put it bluntly, this "general manager" is similar to an individual vendor. When our examiner learned about this situation, his impression of this person was greatly reduced. Maybe he introduced these situations realistically from the beginning, and the examiners would feel much better.

Seeking truth from facts In addition to honesty, candidates can also communicate with examiners by virtue of their frank temperament and sincere emotional expression. In an interview, the examiner asked a candidate why his undergraduate academic performance was average. Do you agree with Long Live Sixty Minutes? The examinee said calmly, "My parents died when I was very young, and only my grandparents and my sister accompanied me. With the help of the party and government and many good people, I was able to grow up. After I was admitted to the university, I persisted in various social practices to help myself finish my studies in order not to cause trouble to all those who care about me. Poor grades are the biggest regret in my undergraduate life, but I think as long as I have enough time, even if it is only half of the study time of ordinary students, I believe my academic performance will be very good. " The examinee did not seek the examiner's sympathy with his bumpy experience. What really touched the examiner was his indomitable spirit in adversity. His self-improvement and self-confidence are frankly revealed in sincere words.

2. Grasp the main points and answer questions

Some candidates think that as long as you say something more in the interview, there will always be something that can "conform" to the examiner's thinking and get a good evaluation. The actual result is "if you talk too much, you lose." If what you say has nothing to do with the answer to the question, then the result is not ideal, what's more, it will be even worse if you say too much. The most ideal method is to focus on the examiner's question, grasp the key points of the question with concise and clear language, and express the key points related to the question clearly. Conciseness can be reflected in the appearance of candidates, but also in the speeches of candidates. Cut to the chase, cut to the chase, easy to understand, articulate, accurate, not too particular about and deliberate processing, not pedantic, not beating around the bush, these concise language styles also have considerable expressiveness and appeal. We often realize that a person who is full of "famous sayings" and talks about terminology is sometimes not as profound as a person with simple language. This is the art of interviewing, which hides cleverness and clumsiness.

Answer questions with "head" instead of just "mouth"

You should answer every question carefully and think carefully before you answer it. During the interview, some candidates responded quickly to show their thinking, and the examiner answered the questions as soon as he asked them, as if he knew the interview questions in advance. In fact, this practice is very bad, because the examiner judges the quality of candidates in all aspects according to their answers, not according to the speed of your answers. Usually, after the examiner asks questions, you can pause for a few seconds or even dozens of seconds. During this time, you can think about how to answer questions and how to express your meaning in an orderly way, which will definitely improve the quality of your answers. In addition, the examiner can understand the necessary pause. Without a pause, the examiner sometimes thinks that you are too hasty to answer the question and don't think about it systematically in your mind. Sometimes, candidates may not hear or understand the examiner's questions. You can ask the examiner to repeat them and don't answer them in a hurry. Don't show off that you don't know or know little. The following are the questions and answers in the interview room:

Examiner: "Do you study Chinese?"

Applicant: "Yes, in addition to Chinese major, I also minored in some management courses."

Examiner: "Do you think your professional knowledge can be used in this position?" (Planning Department of State Environmental Protection Bureau-Editor's Note)

Candidate: "Environmental protection is a major event related to sustainable development. I have taught myself a lot of knowledge in this field, such as environmental noise monitoring, and so on. "

Examiner (leaning forward, interested): "Ah? Can you talk about what noise is like in our daily life? "

Examinee: "This ... noise is just a very noisy sound ..."

From this conversation, we can see that a careless words and deeds of the examinee will ruin his retreat and embarrass himself. In addition, some questions raised by the examiner may be slightly tricky or specious, and some questions hide the true intention of the examiner, so candidates need to think carefully with a calm mind before answering. Perhaps this is the evaluation of candidates' "adaptability" and "alertness".

to be neither humble nor arrogant

Being neither humble nor supercilious is a basic principle of interpersonal communication. It does not simply express a person's friendly communication attitude, but has rich connotations. This is a well-thought-out style, and it is a communication strategy that can advance and retreat freely.

A supercilious attitude in the interview is particularly important for candidates. Some candidates rely on high education or rich work experience or other impressive achievements. They don't pay attention to the basic communication etiquette in the interview examination room, interrupt the examiner at will and don't listen to the guidance of the examination room staff. Such a candidate shows not his elegance and sharpness, self-confidence and courage, but his arrogance and arrogance. This way of life is not only disliked and accepted in the interview examination room, but also will hit a wall everywhere in any communication occasion.

On the contrary, other candidates overemphasize the respect for examiners, and are blindly modest, passive, Nuo Nuo, cautious and timid. Such a passive test-taking style will make the examiner uninterested and even deliberately pick up the shelf, while the candidates will only leave the examiner with a boring, tasteless, clumsy and unsightly impression.

In fact, job hunting is not a job, not a person. Although national civil servants have become a hot spot in the talent market, the competition for applying for national civil servants is extremely fierce, but in any case, candidates and examiners have equal status.

This equality is first embodied in the principle of "voluntariness, reciprocity and reciprocity" in recruitment and application. Candidates and applicants are "two-way choices". Candidates should not only see their own choices, but also their right to choose their own units and positions. There are differences in strength among candidates, and the attraction to candidates is also great or small among civil servants and compared with other occupations.

Introduce yourself in the interview.

Hello, examiners, I feel very honored to be able to stand there for an interview and have the opportunity to consult and learn from examiners. I hope I can show myself to you through this interview, and I hope you will remember me. My name is ... and I am ... Han nationality, with a bachelor's degree in law. I usually like reading books and browsing information online. I am cheerful and easy-going. I can relate to everything around me and get along well with my relatives and friends. And I am full of confidence in life. I have worked as an intern in the procuratorate before, so I have the necessary practical experience. During the four years of studying abroad, I developed a strong personality, which enabled me to overcome some difficulties in my study and life and devote myself to them wholeheartedly. Becoming a lawyer has been my strong desire for many years. If I have the chance to be hired, I think I can definitely get exercise in my work and realize my value. At the same time, I also realize that the relationship between people and work is based on self-knowledge, and I think I have the potential and confidence to do this job well. Civil servant is a sacred and noble profession, which pursues the maximization of public interests, and its fundamental purpose is to serve the people and the country. Lei Feng said: human life is limited, but serving the people is infinite, so I will devote my limited life to serving the people indefinitely.

Things to know in an interview

Interview is often the most direct "hand-to-hand combat" with the interviewer, so every move, every word and deed gives the interviewer a panoramic view. Therefore, interview etiquette is the most important link. Etiquette is the external expression of personal quality and the magic weapon to win an interview. Interview etiquette is composed of many small links. If you know little about etiquette, or ignore the function of etiquette, you will be eliminated in a small link, because even if you get 99 points, those who get 100 points will be eliminated in other ways, that is, the competition is too fierce.

Basic principles of answering interview questions related articles:

★ Classic interview questions and answers for fresh graduates

★ Answering ideas of classic interview questions

★ Ways to answer interview questions

★ 16 interview FAQ answering skills

★ 16 interview frequently asked questions (2)

★ 16 thinking of answering classic interview questions

★ 16 interview FAQ answering skills

★ Classic interview questions and answering skills

★ 16 interview FAQ answering skills (3)