Excuse me, does a great god know what Netease needs to pay attention to when interviewing product managers? Do you have any interview experience to offer?

One: In cognition, the product manager has changed from the initial function developer to the problem solver, but still ignores its foundation and core-understanding the requirements. Product managers must be able to grasp the relationship between product functions and user needs.

Two: Both interviewers mentioned "Why do you want to be a product manager?" I am still not satisfied with my answer. The summary reason is: I believe in the so-called interview skills too much and forget my initial intention to become a product assistant.

Here, I want to strongly vomit those who write facial classics, especially those who write skills (including me). Don't be led by the experience of people who have been there. Think about why you gave up this job in the first place.

To sum up, I wanted to be a product manager for the following reasons:

First: I like to think about problems from a systematic perspective, taking into account the upstream and downstream of the value chain, and not letting myself fall into a generalized situation. Can proceed from the overall situation, grasp problems and solve problems.

Second: Enjoy putting your ideas into practice. Every product manager has a pair of hands of God. Like psychology, there is no end to the study of people. Well, although my heart is heavy, it also makes me find my original heart again. People's inner exploration is endless, and you never know their next choice. Life is full of unknowns and surprises.

Thirdly, I reflected on several questions asked by the interviewer yesterday, and found that in fact, the most essential needs of users still cannot escape psychological research. Socialization, self-improvement, and interest All functional designs should be based on the understanding of the underlying needs, and then the solver. Go to the industry circle to communicate more, there will be many opportunities to show you, and the great god of the recruitment circle also has rich experience to communicate with them, and you can also increase your knowledge and put yourself in.

Finally, I asked the interviewer a question: how to better understand the user's mental model and scene. I replied: talent or experience. The reality is so cruel, most people have no talent, but how many people really prepare in advance to increase their experience? The most terrible thing will be those who are smarter than you, but work harder than you. These people will be the talents that BAT needs.

In fact, there are three ultimate questions in the interview, which are almost eternal themes, that is:

Why do you want to do xx position?

What have you done for this goal?

Please show your talent?

In fact, everyone should be strict with themselves, not be "Mr. Half Bottle", constantly enrich themselves in life and work, ask more questions when solving problems, and think more about their own omissions when being denied. Not everyone is really suitable to be a product manager. Laziness in thought is more terrible than laziness in behavior.