Are there any skills in case analysis in teacher recruitment examination?

Skills, here are examples to illustrate the answering skills of case analysis questions.

Case: When Hua, a famous mathematician, was in junior high school, he was slow to accept and understand mathematical knowledge, so that he often failed the math exam. The teacher thought he was hopeless, and once publicly declared in class that if one of you is a loser in the future, it is Hua. As a result, Hua finally became a world-famous master of mathematics through diligent self-study, hard study and hard work. Combined with the above cases, talk about what kind of student view teachers should establish.

The way to answer case analysis questions is regular and can be found, which is usually called four-part style. The first step is to "examine the questions", because if the materials are too long, reading the materials first and then reading the questions will lead to forgetting the materials and delaying valuable examination time. It should be emphasized that the questions here include questions and exam knowledge points. In view of the problems of the above materials, no matter what kind of problems, we default to "evaluation", that is, "first evaluation, then analysis" and "first judgment of values, then theoretical analysis". Then, in view of the above materials, it is not appropriate to judge the teacher's practice first. The knowledge point given by the question is the view of students under the new curriculum reform. The review of the problem has ended and the next step has been entered.

The second step is to "review the knowledge points". It should be emphasized that all the relevant knowledge points are reviewed here. The purpose of this is to prevent candidates from losing points because they have dropped knowledge points. Chinese experts suggest that candidates can write the knowledge points on the draft paper in this link to prevent them from temporarily forgetting the relevant knowledge points because of the tension in the exam. In view of the above materials, the knowledge we recall is that "the view of students under the new curriculum reform includes that students are developing people, students are unique people and students are independent people". Review the knowledge points and move on to the next step.

The third step is "writing", which is the key step of grading. Writing determines success or failure. First of all, the handwriting should be neat and the paper should be neat to give the examiner a good first impression. A good beginning is half the battle. Imagine that the examiner is tired of reading countless papers. If the examinee's handwriting is scrawled and the paper is not neat, even if the knowledge points are correct, it is difficult to enter the examiner's eyes. The rule of writing knowledge points is "after judging which knowledge points are embodied in the case, the writing method is a theoretical point plus corresponding materials". Everyone should remember to put the theoretical points ahead and the materials behind, so as to give the evaluator an intuitive perception and let the evaluator find the knowledge points in the first time, instead of looking for the knowledge points through the long materials written by the candidates. According to the above materials, it can be judged that the material embodies the knowledge point that "students are developing people", and the theoretical point can be written as "the new curriculum reform thinks that students are developing people". The development of students is regular and has development potential, and they are people in the process of development. The material part can be used in its own language, and there is no need to copy the material. The teacher thinks that Hua is hopeless because he often fails math and decides that he will have no future. It is unreasonable not to regard China as a developing person. The writing part is over and the next step has been taken.

The fourth part, "summary", the case analysis question is the subjective question to examine the examinee's ability. We pay attention to wearing boots with hats. At the end of the answer, I hope the candidates can answer completely and be foolproof. In view of the above materials, we can see that the teacher's approach is inappropriate, so in the summary step, it is suggested that candidates add their own views, that is, if I were a teacher, what would I do, write the correct approach, and let the judges see your feelings, attitudes and values, which will definitely get higher scores. We can sum up as "To sum up, teachers' improper practices will affect children's physical and mental health, and even their lifelong growth. If I were this teacher, I would seriously practice the concept of students under the new curriculum reform, treat students as developed people, unique people and independent people, and cultivate students into all-round development people. "