Why do people in the film industry and the general public have different opinions about Oppenheimer?

Professionalism: People in the film industry may be more professional and have a deeper understanding and understanding of the production and performance of films, so the evaluation of films may be more objective and rational. The mass audience may be more influenced by emotions and personal preferences, and the evaluation of movies may be more subjective and emotional.

Different expectations: people in the film industry may have higher expectations and expectations for movies because they have a deeper understanding of the production and performance of movies. The expectations of the mass audience for the film may be relatively low, because they know relatively little about the production and performance of the film.

Different evaluation criteria: people in the film industry and the public audience may have different evaluation criteria for movies. People in the film industry may pay more attention to the production and performance skills of movies, while the mass audience may pay more attention to the plot and story emotion of movies.

There are different sources of evaluation: people in the film industry and the general audience may get film information and evaluation from different channels, which may affect their evaluation of the film. For example, people in the film industry may get more film information and comments from professional media and evaluation agencies, while the public audience may get more film information and comments from social media and word-of-mouth communication.